期刊文献+

基于改进FMEA的装备采购供应链质量风险评估 被引量:2

Quality risk assessment of equipment procurement supply chain based on improved FMEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统失效模式和后果分析(FMEA)应用于装备采购供应链质量风险评估时存在风险种类识别不全面、风险评价结果容易偏离实际的问题,将FMEA方法与故障树分析法相结合,对风险识别流程进行优化,采用粗糙集和灰色关联决策理论对FMEA的风险评价方法进行改进,使风险评价结果与其实际更相符,并通过实例证明了该方法的适用性与有效性。 When traditional failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA)is applied to the quality risk assessment of equipment procurement supply chain,problems may occur such as incomplete identification of risk types and risk assessment results that easily deviate from the actual situation.In view of the problems,the FMEA method and the fault tree analysis method were combined to carry out the risk identification process optimization.Rough set and grey relational decision theory were applied to improve the FMEA risk evaluation method,so that the risk evaluation results were more in line with the actual situation,and the applicability and effectiveness of the method were proved through examples.
作者 黄栋 周景冉 HUANG Dong;ZHOU Jing-ran(Dept. of Management Engineering and Equipment Economics, Naval Univ. of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China;Unit No. 31121, Nanjing 210000, China)
出处 《海军工程大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第2期50-56,共7页 Journal of Naval University of Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(19BGL291)。
关键词 失效模式和后果分析 装备采购 供应链质量 风险评估 failure mode and effects analysis equipment procurement supply chain quality risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献44

  • 1李德毅,孟海军,史雪梅.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展,1995,32(6):15-20. 被引量:1212
  • 2王冬冬,达庆利.基于模糊Petri网的供应链诊断建模分析[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,36(4):662-666. 被引量:18
  • 3陈明,王国华,陈云,陈炳森.大型复杂产品失效模式分析[J].机械设计,2006,23(9):6-8. 被引量:3
  • 4Pillay A.Wang J.Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning[J].Reliab Eng Sys Saf,2003,79:69~85.
  • 5Chin K S.Wang Y M.Ka Kwai Poon G.Yang J B.Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach[J].Comput Oper Res,2009,36:1768~1779.
  • 6Tay K M.Lim C P.Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules reduction system for prioritization of failures[J].Int J Quality Reliab Mgmt,2006,23(8):1047~1066.
  • 7Wang Y M,Chin K S,Ka Kwai Poon G,Yang J B.Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean[J].Expert Syst Appl,2009,36:1195~1207.
  • 8Yang J B,Wang Y M,Xu D L,Chin K S.The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties[J].Eur J Oper Res,2006,17:309~343.
  • 9Guo M,Yang J B,Chin K S,Wang H W,Liu X B.Evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under both fuzzy and interval uncertainty[J].IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst,2009,17(3):683~698.
  • 10Chen C B,Klien C M.A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetic,Part B1997,27(1):26~35.

共引文献40

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部