期刊文献+

基于FAERS数据库的替格瑞洛相关不良事件信号检测与分析 被引量:5

Detection and Analysis of Ticagrelor-Related Adverse Event Signals Based on the FAERS Database
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:挖掘与分析替格瑞洛上市后的药品不良事件信号,为临床安全使用该药提供参考。方法:从美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中提取2011年第1季度至2021年第2季度共42个季度的替格瑞洛所致不良事件报告,采用报告比值比法(ROR)和比例报告比值法(PRR)对上述不良事件报告进行数据挖掘与分析。结果:提取到以替格瑞洛为首要怀疑药物的不良事件记录共34 611条,检测到不良事件信号共317个,涉及13 930例次不良事件报告,涉及20个系统和器官分类,其中主要为心脏疾病(3 269例,占23.47%),呼吸系统、胸及纵隔疾病(3 014例,占21.64%)和全身性疾病及给药部位各种反应(1 407例,占10.10%)。发生频次较高的不良事件信号与药品说明书总体一致;未在药品说明书中提及的、临床需关注的信号主要有血压升高、记忆受损、感受异常、听力减退和室性心律等。结论:使用替格瑞洛时,除了常见的呼吸系统、出血等不良反应外,其他少见的严重不良反应如颅内出血、心动过缓和潮式呼吸也应得到临床重视。 OBJECTIVE: To explore and analyze the adverse event signals of ticagrelor after the listing, and provide reference for the safe clinical use of the drug. METHODS: From the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System(FAERS) database, 42 quarters of adverse event reports due to ticagrelor were extracted from the first quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2021. The data mining and signal detection were performed by reporting odds ratio(ROR) and proportional reporting ratio(PRR). RESULTS: A total of 34 611 adverse event records with ticagrelor as the primary suspected drugs were extracted, and a total of 317 adverse event signals were detected, including 13 930 adverse event reports in 20 system and organ classifications, among which cardiac diseases(3 269 cases, 23.47%), respiratory system, thoracic and mediastinal diseases(3 014 cases, 21.64%) and systemic diseases and various reactions at the administration site(1 407 cases, 10.10%) took the lead. The frequency of adverse event signals was generally consistent with the drug instructions. Signals that were not mentioned in the drug instructions and required clinical concern included: increased blood pressure, memory impairment, abnormal sensation, hearing loss and ventricular rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: When using ticagrelor, in addition to the common respiratory and bleeding adverse drug reactions, other rare severe adverse drug reactions such as intracranial hemorrhage, bradycardia and tidal breathing should also receive clinical attention.
作者 季春梅 周建成 JI Chunmei;ZHOU Jiancheng(Dept.of Pharmacy,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital,Nanjing 210029,China)
出处 《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2022年第5期632-635,640,共5页 Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词 替格瑞洛 美国FDA不良事件报告系统 不良事件 信号分析 Ticagrelor US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Adverse event Signal analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献170

  • 1张志,高航,陶贵周.氯吡格雷致血小板减少性紫癜1例[J].中国心血管病研究,2005,3(3):240-240. 被引量:6
  • 2王小艳.急性冠脉综合征后6个月死亡和心肌梗死的预测:前瞻性的多国观察性研究(GRACE)[J].中国处方药,2006(11):25-26. 被引量:138
  • 3陈五波.氢氯吡格雷致两上肢血小板减少性紫癜1例[J].药物流行病学杂志,2007,16(4):214-214. 被引量:3
  • 4Matsushita, Y, Y. Kuroda, S. Niwa, et al. Criteria revision and performance comparison of three methods of signal detection applied to the spontaneous reporting database of a pharmaceutical manufacturer[J]. Drug Saf,2007, 30(8):715-726.
  • 5van Puijenbroek, E.P., A. Bate, H.G. Leufkens, et al. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,2002, 11(1): 3-10.
  • 6Kubota, K, D. Koide T. Hirai. Comparison of data mining methodologies using Japanese spontaneous reports[J]. Pharmacoep-idemiol Drug Saf,2004,13(6): 387-394.
  • 7Stahl, M, M. Lindquist, I.R. Edwards, et al. Introducing triage logic as a new strategy for the detection of signals in the WHO Drug Monitoring Database[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2004,13 (6):355-363.
  • 8Roux, E, F Thiessard, A. Fourrier, et al. Evaluation of statistical association measures for the automatic signal generation in pharmacovigilance[J]. IEEE Transactions On Information Technology In Biomedicine:A Publication Of The IEEE Engineering In Medicine And Biology Society,2005, 9(4): 518-527.
  • 9Almenoff, J, J M Tonning, A L Gould, et al. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance[J]. Drug Saf,2005,28 (11): 981-1007.
  • 10Rothman, K J, S Lanes,S T Sacks. The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2004,13(8): 519-523.

共引文献2013

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部