金岳霖对怀疑论的回应——从“事”和“理”两个角度看

Jin Yuelin’s Response to Skepticism:From Facts and Original Rules

金岳霖先生在西方哲学的学术框架下继续对知识进行了探讨,并在专著《知识论》中建立了其独特的知识论体系。文章通过梳理《知识论》文本发现金先生以正觉立论,对能否通过官觉经验获得知识的怀疑作出了回应:在他看来,我们既可以知道事实,也可以知道固然的理;前者依据正觉,后者依据归纳原则和意念图案的固化。文章接着指出,金先生对怀疑的回应虽然清晰,但仍不是完整的。问题出现在了知道事实和知道固然的理的依据上:其一,在事的方面,涉及到正觉的定义,需要说明对于一个个体,其所属的类的法则是什么;其二,在理的方面,涉及到真的普遍命题的发现,还需要说明意念图案的固化机制是什么。

Jin Yuelin continued to discuss knowledge under the academic framework of western philosophy,and established his unique epistemological system in Theory of Knowledge.This paper shows that Jin’s response to the skepticism:we can know facts as well as original rules,by ZhengJue and inductive principles and constancy of ideas connection.Although Jin’s response to the skepticism was clear,it is still incomplete.The problem appeared on the basis he provided:firstly,it is necessary to explain what the law of the class is for an individual;secondly,it is also necessary to explain how to confirm the constancy of ideas connection.