期刊文献+

《对二语课堂评估的重新概念化:实践论与研究者—教师伙伴关系》评介

Review on Toward a Reconceptualization of Second Language Classroom Assessment:Praxis and Researcher-teacher Partnership
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1.引言课堂评估是课堂研究的一个重要组成部分,是连接教、学、考的重要方式之一(金艳,孙杭2020)。然而,尽管课堂评估被普遍认为有助于提升教学效能,但具体评估实践的概念框架尚不完善,如课堂评估标准是否应与大规模测试标准相一致;教师是否具备创建评估标准的专业知识;研究者的课堂评估参与度如何等。为解决这些问题,国际教育评估领域的学者们提出了若干课堂评估模型,如动态评估(Poehner 2008)、促学评估(Black&Wiliam 2009)和面向学习的评估(Turner&Purpura 2016)。虽然上述模型都旨在制定一个更符合教师和学习者利益与需求的课堂评估框架,但如何有效将其用以指导课堂评估实践仍有待深入探讨。
作者 徐鹰 谢石 陈芸 XU Ying;XIE Shi;CHEN Yun
出处 《外语测试与教学》 2022年第2期57-60,共4页 Foreign Language Testing and Teaching
基金 教育部产学合作协同育人项目(编号202102093109) 华南理工大学本科课程思政示范课程(编号X2WY-C9217008)的阶段性研究成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1唐雄英,章少泉.新型评价在大学英语教学中的实施和问题[J].外语与外语教学,2007(1):14-19. 被引量:77
  • 2Akeari, R. & B. Dadvand, 2011. "Does formal teacher ed- ucation make a difference9 A comparison of pedagogical thought units of B. A. versus M.A. Teachers". The Mod- ern Language Journal. 95( 1 ) : 44 -60.
  • 3Benson, P., A. Chik, X. Gao, J. Huang, & W. Wang. 2009. " Qualitative Research in Language Teaching and Learning Journals, 1997 - 2006" . The Modern Lan- guage Journal. 93 ( 1 ) : 79 - 90.
  • 4Bown, J. 2009. "Self- Regulatory Strategies and Agency in Self- Instructed Language Learning: A Situated View". The Modern Language Journal. 93 (4) : 570 - 583.
  • 5Brown, G., K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams. 1996. Peororm- ance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Bylund, E., N. Abrahamsson, & K. Hyhenstam, 2012. "Does first language maintenance hamper nativelikeness in a second language? - A study of ultimate attainment in early bilinguals". Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 34(2) : 215 -241.
  • 7Cadman, K. & J. Brown. 2011. "TESOL and TESD in re-mote aboriginal Australia: The ' true' story? ". TESOL Quarterly. 45 ( 3 ) : 440 - 462.
  • 8Cammarata, L. & D. J. Tedick. 2012. "Balancing Content and Language in Instruction : The Experience of Immersion Teachers". The Modern Language Journal. 96 ( 2 ) : 251 - 269.
  • 9Carter, S. M., & M. Little. 2007. "Justifying Knowledge, Justifying Method, Taking Action: Epistemologies, Meth- odologies, and Methods in Qualitative Research". Quali- tative Health Research 17(10) : 1316 -1328.
  • 10Denzin, N. K. & S. Yvonna. 2005. " The discipline and practice of qualitative research". In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln ( Eds. ), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc: 1 -32.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部