期刊文献+

大学排名中声誉指标的功用与使用 被引量:6

Reputation Index in University Rankings:Function and Use
下载PDF
导出
摘要 声誉是表征大学质量的一种符号,也是大学发展的重要资本。伴随排名在高等教育系统中的出现,声誉这种主观认知逐渐被纳入大学排名的指标体系并被赋予了可以测量且可以计算的“客观属性”。经过百年的发展,声誉指标以不同形式存在于现代大学排名体系之中。大学排名中的声誉指标增加了大学排名的合法性,提高了大学排名的有效性,促使大学重视声誉建设。但与此同时,声誉指标使用中存在诸如指标设计缺乏科学依据、声誉调查中存有偏见以及引起大学竞争异化等主要问题。为了更好地发挥大学排名中声誉指标的作用,各利益相关者需要善用声誉指标,这既需要排名机构和所有利益相关者在沟通的基础上形成一定程度的共识,也需要各方的集体行动。 Reputation is not only a symbol of university quality, but also an important capital of university development. With the emergence of rankings in higher education system, reputation, as a subjective cognition,is gradually incorporated into the index system of university ranking and endowed with a measurable and computable“objective attribute”. After a hundred years of development, reputation index exists in different forms in the ranking system of modern universities. The reputation index in university rankings raises the legitimacy and effectiveness of university rankings, and urges universities to attach importance to reputation building. However,at the same time, there are some main problems in the use of reputation index, such as lack of scientific basis in indicator design, prejudice in reputation investigation and alienation of university competition. In order to give full play to the role of reputation index in university rankings, all stakeholders need to make good use of reputation index, which requires not only the ranking institutions and all stakeholders to form a certain degree of consensus on the basis of communication, but also the collective actions of all parties.
作者 苏永建 宋梦赏 SU Yongjian;SONG Mengshang
出处 《高教发展与评估》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期1-10,I0002,共11页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“学科评估对大学学科建设的影响及改进策略研究”(BIA200199)。
关键词 大学排名 声誉指标 大学声誉 大学质量 university rankings reputation index university reputation university quality
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献19

  • 1刘创,刘红英.学术声誉:大学评价体系建构的基点[J].中国高教研究,2006(6):36-37. 被引量:19
  • 2亚历克斯.埃舍尔,马斯莫.萨维诺,王亚敏,侯书栋,李立国.差异的世界:大学排名的全球调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(5):1-10. 被引量:24
  • 3Frans van Vught. Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education[J]. Higher Education Policy,2008 (21).
  • 4Conard Michael J, Conard Maureen A. An Analysis of Academic Reputation as Perceived by Consumers of Higher Education[J]. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2000(09).
  • 52011中国大学排行榜评级指标体系[EB/OL].http://cuaa.net/cur/2011/23.shtml,2011-12-15.
  • 62011年网大声誉调查与院校数据核查[EB/OL].http://rank.netbig.com/,2011-12-15.
  • 7University Rankings in 2011 [EB/OL].http://www. topuniversities.com/university-rankings, 2011-12-15.
  • 8Methodology: Academic Reputation[EB/OL]. http://www.iu. qs.com/projects-and-services/rankings-indicators/ methodology-academic-reputation/, 2011-12-15.
  • 9Behind the numbers: reputation ranking methodology explained [EB/OL]. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/ world-university-rankings/2010-2011/reputation- methodology.html, 2011-12-15.
  • 10A comprehensive view of institutional rerformance[EB/OL]. http://researchanalytics, thomsonreuters.com/ institutionalprofiles/, 2011-12-15.

共引文献34

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部