期刊文献+

基于FTA-BN模型的粉尘爆炸风险评估及控制研究 被引量:5

Research on risk assessment and control of dust explosion based on FTA-BN model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 粉尘爆炸风险评估涉及到许多不确定、客观性不足的因素。从粉尘爆炸5要素出发,引入事故树分析法(FTA)与贝叶斯网络(BN),构建FTA-BN模型。首先通过对粉尘爆炸事故的原因进行综合分析,绘制粉尘爆炸事故的事故树,同时采用GeNIE软件将事故树转换为贝叶斯网络,利用贝叶斯网络模型的双向推理功能,既能评估粉尘爆炸风险等级,又能逆向推理找出造成粉尘爆炸的关键影响因素。根据粉尘爆炸原理,对粉尘爆炸风险点采取措施,为粉尘爆炸风险控制提供措施依据。 Dust explosion risk assessment involves many uncertain and insufficient objective factors.Starting from the five elements of dust explosion,the fault tree analysis method(FTA)and Bayesian network(BN)are introduced to construct the FTA-BN model.First,through a comprehensive analysis of the causes of dust explosion accidents,the accident tree of dust explosion accidents is drawn,besides,the accident tree is converted into a Bayesian network using GeNlE software,and the two-way reasoning function of the Bayesian network model can be used to assess the dust explosion risk level and reverse the infernce to find out the key influencing factors causing the dust explosion.According to the principle of dust explosion,measures are taken for dust explosion risk points to provide a basis for dust explosion risk control.
作者 陶梦醒 汪涛 TAO Mengxing;WANG Tao(Sinosteel Wuhan Safety & Environmental Protection Research Institute Co.,Ltd. Wuhan 430081)
出处 《工业安全与环保》 2022年第6期43-46,共4页 Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection
关键词 粉尘防爆 风险评估 FTA-BN模型 控制 dust explosion protection risk assessment FTA-BN model control
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1Cox Jr L A. What's wrong with risk matrix[J]. Risk Analysis,2008, 28(2): 497.
  • 2Eskesen S D, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management., international tunnelling association, working group No. 2 [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19: 217.
  • 3Aven T, Heide B. Reliability and validity of risk analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94.. 1862.
  • 4Cox Jr L A, Babayev D, Huber W. Some limitations of qualitative risk rating systems [J]. Risk Analysis, 2005, 25 (3): 651.
  • 5Ni H H, Chen A, Chen N. Some extensions on risk matrix approach[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48.. 1269.
  • 6Kaplan S. The words of risk analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 1997, 17(4) : 407.
  • 7Hansson S O. Seven myths of risk[J]. Risk Management, 2005, 7(2): 7.
  • 8Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1).. 77.
  • 9Hirschberger M, Qi Y, Steuer R E. Randomly generating portfolio-selection covariance matrices with specified distributional characteristics[ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 177(2007) : 1610.
  • 10Ayyub B M. Risk analysis in engineering and economics[M]. Baca Raton.. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2003.

共引文献93

同被引文献70

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部