期刊文献+

基于认知负荷理论的优质教学类PPT设计探析

Analysis of PPT Design for High-quality Teaching Based on Cognitive Load Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于线上和线下教学,PPT课件是大多数课程的必备辅助工具。良器在手,需用之有道。提高设计和制作PPT课件的能力成为很多教师提升教学水平的途径和需求之一。分析目前PPT课件的常见问题和原因,从信息传递及加工过程、容量有限原则和图示理论三方面阐述了认知负荷理论,结合认知负荷理论探究了优质教学类PPT设计原则,基于多通道的优化选择、信息协作的优化,给出了对应的PPT设计技巧,以及线上线下课程的PPT实例。只有从“学”的角度出发、符合认知规律的PPT才是优秀的PPT,才能辅助教学,成为提升教学效果的助推器。 For online and offline teaching,PPT courseware is a necessary auxiliary tool for most courses.A good tool should be used in the right way.Improving the ability to design PPT courseware is one of the ways and needs for many teachers to improve their teaching level.This paper first analyzes the common problems and the reasons in the PPT courseware making,and then expounds the cognitive load theory from three aspects:the information transmission and the processing process,the principle of limited capacity,and the graphic theory.Finally,the PPT design principles of high-quality teaching are discussed combined with the cognitive load theory.Based on multi-channel optimization selection and information collaboration optimization,the corresponding PPT design skills and PPT examples of online and offline courses are given.Only from the perspective of“learning”and in line with cognitive law can an excellent PPT courseware be made,which can assist teaching and become a booster to improve the teaching effect.
作者 白康 王旭光 翟永杰 苏杰 金秀章 BAI Kang;WANG Xu-guang;ZHAI Yong-jie;SU Jie;JIN Xiu-zhang(Department of Automation,North China Electric Power University,Baoding,Hebei 071003,China)
出处 《教育教学论坛》 2022年第21期125-128,共4页 Education And Teaching Forum
基金 2019—2020年河北省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目“基于学习科学和‘课堂派’平台的课程信息化教学模式研究与实践”(2019GJJG408)。
关键词 教学类PPT 认知负荷理论 多通道优化选择 信息协作 教学效果 teaching PPT cognitive load theory multi-channel optimization selection information collaboration teaching effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1王朋娇,郭巍,张恒庆.PowerPoint教学演示文稿的精益化设计策略研究[J].电化教育研究,2009,30(3):104-108. 被引量:35
  • 2John SwUer, Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning[J], Cognitive Science, 1988(12) :257 - 285.
  • 3Graham Cooper. Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW [A]. School of Education Studies [C]. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 1998 : 11.
  • 4Fred Paas, Alexander Renkl & John Sweller. Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments [ J ], Educational Psychologist, 2003, 38(1 ) : 1 - 4.
  • 5Michelle Patrick Cook, Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles[J], Science Education , 2006, 90(6) :1073 - 1091.
  • 6Robert Carlson, Paul Chandler & John Sweller. Learning and Understanding Science Instructional Material [ J ], Joural of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95 (3) : 629 - 640.
  • 7T. Mikael Winberg , C. Anders R. Berg . Students Cognitive Focus During a Chemistry Laboratory Exercise: Effects of a Computer- Simulated Prelab [ J ], Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2007, 44(8):1108-1133.
  • 8Zeynel Kablan , Mu hire Erden. Instructional efficiency of integrated and separated text with animated presentations in computer - based science instruction [ OL ], www. elsevier. com/locate/compedu/doi: 10. 1016/]. compedu. 2007.07. 002.
  • 9Precham Dechsri , Loretta L. Jones, Hemy W. Heikkinen . Effect of Laboratory Mannul Design Ineorperating Visual Information- Processing Aids on Students Learning and Attitudes[J ], Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 1997,34(9):891 - 904.
  • 10Marie Iding, E. Barbara Klemm, Martha. E. Crosby & Thomas Speitel. Interactive Texts, Figures and Tables for Learning Science: Cortstructivism in Text Design, International [ J ], Joural of Instructional Media, 2002,29(4):441 -452.

共引文献506

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部