摘要
文章通过对文献的梳理和总结,从形成背景、概念内涵和规划策略的角度,比较新城市主义与中国新型城镇化的异同:在形成背景层面,两者虽有着不同的形成背景,但都是为了解决城市蔓延的问题;在概念内涵层面,新型城镇化的内涵更具广泛性和实践性;在规划策略层面,新城市主义的规划策略对于新型城镇化的推进具有借鉴意义。在此基础上,剖析我国新型城镇化实践中,生搬硬套新城市主义理论而产生的3个误区,并提出解决思路,以期为我国新型城镇化的高质量发展提供启示和借鉴。
By sorting out and summarizing the literature,this paper compares the similarities and differences between new urbanism and China’s new urbanization from the perspectives of formation background,conceptual connotation and planning strategy.In terms of the formation background,regardless of different formation backgrounds,they are both aimed at solving the problem of urban sprawl;in terms of conceptual connotation,the connotation of new urbanization is more extensive and practical;in terms of planning strategy,the planning strategy of new urbanism has reference significance for the promotion of new urbanization.On this basis,this paper analyzes 3 misunderstandings caused by imitating the theory of new urbanism in the practice of new urbanization in our country,and proposes solutions,so as to provide inspiration and reference for the high-quality development of new urbanization in our country.
作者
郑皓
邓华
ZHENG Hao;DENG Hua
出处
《住宅科技》
2022年第4期39-43,共5页
Housing Science
基金
国家自然科学基金“苏南新型农村社区老年人居住环境满意度及其影响机制研究--基于时空行为变迁的视角”(编号:5167082771)。
关键词
新城市主义
新型城镇化
城镇发展模式
概念内涵
规划策略
new urbanism
new urbanization
urban development model
conceptual connotation
planning strategy