东亚哲学研究朝鲜朱子学关于“气未用事”的讨论

The Discussion on the “Qi Bu Yong Shi” in Korean Neo-Confucianism

黄榦论性说引述的朱子晚年关于“气不用事”的观念,在中国的宋明理学中引起不少讨论。由于朱熹和黄榦的地位,朝鲜时代的性理学比起中国的朱子学更为重视“气不用事”对“未发”理解的重要性,对朱子的有关论述也做了更细致的梳理,与“未发”相关的讨论也更为深入。朝鲜性理学在这个问题上形成了本然之性派和气质之性派的两种主张对立,也更为明显,而中国的朱子学对此虽有不同观点,但并未形成明确的两派争辩。

Zhu Zi’s concept of “Qi Bu Yong Shi” in his later years cited by Huan Gan has aroused a lot of discussion in the Neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming Dynasties in China. Due to the status of Zhu Xi and Huang Gan, Neo-Confucianism in the Korean dynasty attached more attention to the importance of understanding of “ Qi Bu Yong Shi” than Chinese Zhu Xi school. In the Korean dynasty Zhu Zi’s discussion related to “Weifa” were sorted out more carefully, and the discussion was more in-depth.Korean Neo-Confucianism on this issue formed the two propositions of nature, and the Chinese Zhu Zi school although has different views, did not form a clear standpoint.