期刊文献+

西方前现代智识传统中的“经验”概念 被引量:1

The Concept of Experientia in Premodern Western Intellectual Tradition
原文传递
导出
摘要 “经验”是现代自然科学研究方法的关键概念之一,对现代经验-实验概念的历史背景进行研究有助于理解这种认识方式所具有的特殊地位。通过考察西方前现代时期哲学、医学、隐秘科学、工匠技艺及神学等领域对“经验”概念的运用及讨论,文章试图对“经验”这一概念的理论内涵及语义流变进行初步澄清,并指出“经验”一词在取得今天通行的科学与哲学意义之前拥有广阔的语义领域,而现代“经验”或“实验”的生成是许多智识领域共同发挥作用的结果。 “Experience”is one of the key concepts in the methodology of modern scientific research.An investigation on the historical background of the modern idea of experience-experiment can help us to understand these special epistemic concepts.By examining the use and discussion of the concept of experientia/experimentum in premodern Western philosophy,medicine,occult sciences,artisan practices and theology,this article attempts to provide a preliminary clarification on the theoretical implications and semantic changes of this concept.It also attempts to show that the word“experience”has a much larger semantic field before it obtains its current scientific and philosophical meaning,and that many intellectual trends have contributed to the making of modern“experience”and“experiment”.
作者 高洋 GAO Yang(Institute of Advanced Study in History of Science,Northwest University,Xi’an 710127,China)
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期51-57,共7页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“《赫尔墨斯文集》译注及研究”(19CZX011)。
关键词 经验 实验 概念史 experience experiment conceptual history
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1科恩:科学革命的编史学研究[M],张卜天译,长沙:湖南科学技术出版,2012.
  • 2Hessen, M. The Socio-economic Roots of Newton's principia[C]. In Science at the Cross Roads. ed. by Bukharin N. I. et al. 2nd Edition. London: Frank Cass and Company Limited. 1971. p. 151--207.
  • 3Krohn, W.. Raven, D. The 'Zilsel Thesis' in the Context of Edgar Zilsel's Research Programme[J]. Social Studies of Science. 2000. p. 925.
  • 4Zilsel, E. The Sociological Roots of Science[J]. American Journal of Sociology. 1942. pp.544-- 562. Also in The Social Origins of Modern Science. ed. by Raven D. et al. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2000. p. 7.
  • 5Raven, D.. Krohn, W. Edgar Zilsel: His Life and Work (1891--1944)[C]. In The Social Origins of Modern Science. pp. xxi-lxii. White, L. Medieval Engineering and the Sociology of Knowledge[J]. The Pacific Historical Review. 1975. pp.l--21.
  • 6Also in Medieval Religion and Technology: collected essays. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1978. pp. 317--338.
  • 7White, L. Medical Astrologers and Late Medieval Technology[J]. Iator. 6. pp. 295--308. Also in Medieval Religion and Technology. pp. 279--315.
  • 8Zilsel, E. The Methods of Humanism[C]. In The Social Origins of Modern Science. 2000. p. 48.
  • 9Kristeller, E O. Remarks on Zilsel's 'The Methods of Humanism'[C]. In The Social Origins of Modern Science. 2000. p. 68.
  • 10Zilsel, E. The Origins of William Gilbert's Scientific Method[J].Journal of the History of Ideas,2(1), 1--32. In The Social Origins of Modern Science. 2000. pp. 71--95.

共引文献7

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部