期刊文献+

论简·班尼特生态哲学中的物质施动性

On the Agency of Things in Bennett's Ecological Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面临后现代全球困境,西方政治科学研究从科学主义与人本主义转向新唯物主义。新唯物主义指出物质具有内在的施动性,美国当代政治理论家简·班尼特的生态哲学采用“行为体”和“组合体”的概念,把物质施动性置于更广阔的政治生态范畴进行研究,得出物质施事能力具有分散性和联动性的结论。班尼特突破浅生态学和深生态学的认识局限,对环境议题进行更深层的探究,并创造性地提出“生机唯物论”这一概念。将其与马克思历史唯物主义进行比较,结果表明,其理论局限在于没有把唯物主义从物质相态推进到实践形态。 Facing the global-wide postmodern dilemma,the Western political science has experienced a transition from Scientism and Humanism to New Materialism which argues that the agency of things is immanent.The contemporary American political theorist Jane Bennett studies the agency of things in a broader category of political ecology by adopting the concepts of"actant"and"assemblage"and draws the conclusion that the agency of things is distributed and confederate.Breaking through the cognitive limitations of Shallow Ecology and Deep Ecology,Bennett makes further research on environmental issues and creatively puts forward the concept of"vital materialism".By comparing it with Marxist Materialism,this paper claims that the limitation of Bennett's Ecological Philosophy is that it does not push on with Materialism from matter phase to practical form.
作者 马丽莉 钟道贤 Ma Lili;Zhong Daoxian(School of Foreign Languages,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050024,China)
出处 《河北工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第2期59-66,74,共9页 Journal of Hebei University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 班尼特 行为体 组合体 施动性 Bennett actants assemblage agency
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1金惠敏.霍尔的文章,麦克罗比的眼睛——霍尔文化研究三大主题的评议[J].江西社会科学,2006,26(8):230-235. 被引量:6
  • 2张世英.“后现代主义”对“现代性”的批判与超越[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(1):43-48. 被引量:144
  • 3Morris Berman, The Reenchantment of the World, Cornell University Press,1981, p. 1.
  • 4Nick Srnicek, Maria Fotou and Edmund Arghand, Introduction: Materialism and World Politics, Journal of International Studies, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2013, p. 397.
  • 5[美]大卫·格里芬.《后现代科学》,马季方,译,中央编译出版社,1997年,第18页.
  • 6Jane Bennett, Vibrant Matter, Durham: Duke University Press, 2010, p. 21.
  • 7Diana Coole, 2013, p. 463.
  • 8http://www, unep. org/chinese.
  • 9Diana Coole, 2005, pp. 459 - 460.
  • 10李泽厚.《批判哲学的批判》,三联书店,2013年,第378页.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部