期刊文献+

Acupuncture for low back pain:a clinical practice guideline from the Hong Kong taskforce of standardized acupuncture practice 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 OBJECTIVE:To develop a clinical practice guideline to guide the treatment of low back pain by acupuncture.METHODS:An integrative approach of systematic review of literature,clinical evidence classification,expert opinion surveying,and consensus establishing via a Delphi program was utilized during the developing process.Both evidence-based practice standards and the personalized features of acupuncture were taken into considerations.RESULTS:Based on clinical evidence and expert opinions,we developed a clinical practice guideline for the treatment of low back pain with acupuncture.These recommendations have a wide coverage spanning from Western Medicine diagnosis and Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome differentiation,to acupuncture treatment procedures,as well as post treatment care for rehabilitation and follow-ups.The recommendations for acupuncture practice included treatment principles,therapeutic regimens,and operational procedures.The levels of evidence and strength of recommendation were rated for each procedure of practice.CONCLUSION:A clinical practice guideline for acupuncture treating low back pain was developed based on contemporary clinical evidence and experts'consensus to provide best currently agreeable practice guideline for domestic and international stakeholders.
出处 《Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine》 SCIE CSCD 2022年第1期140-147,共8页 中医杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by Hong Kong Hospital Authority-funded Project:Development of Chinese Medicine Acupuncture Clinical Practice Guideline(CPG)in Low Back Pain(HA105/48 PT 19(2013/14)) National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health,National Institutes of Health(NIH NCCIH)-funded Project:“Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field:Resource for Research(R24 AT001293-02)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1王宁华,张传汉,南登崑.实验痛评测方法之一:压痛阈[J].国外医学(物理医学与康复学分册),2004,24(3):97-98. 被引量:17
  • 2Glasziou P, Vandenbrouche JP, Chalmers I. Assessing the quality of research. BMJ 2004 ;328 : 39-41.
  • 3GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328 : 1490-1497.
  • 4英国国家卫生服务部评价与传播中心.http://www.york.ac.uk/crd.
  • 5英国循证医学中心.http://www.cebm.net/levels-of-evidence.asp.
  • 6National Health and Medical Research Council. A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Commonwealth of Australia 1999. http://www. health. gov. au/nhmrc/publicat/synopses/cp30syn. htm.
  • 7Tugwell P, Maxwell L, Buchbinder R, et al. Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. About the Cochrane Collaboration [Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)] 2007, Issue 1. Art. No: MUSKEL.
  • 8WHO. Guidelines for WHO Guidelines (Annex B). EIP/ GPE/EQC/2003.1. p18. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 9Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, et al. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature. Crit Care 2005 ;9 : R575-582.
  • 10Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315 : 629-634.

共引文献271

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部