期刊文献+

高原山区铁路工程建设地质安全评价:思路与方法 被引量:6

Geological safety evaluation of railway engineering construction inplateau mountainous region: ideas and methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 工程地质评价是保障重大工程建设安全的重要工作内容。本文面向新时代重大工程规划建设需求,提出了地质安全评价的内涵和目标任务,以高原山区铁路工程建设为例,阐述了地质安全评价的方法、工作流程和应用实例。着重提出:服务铁路工程的不同规划建设阶段对应于不同的评价尺度要求,规划阶段适用区域廊带尺度,以区域地壳稳定性评价为基调,基本比例尺可≤1:5万,目的是定性给出廊带安全性或适宜性;可研阶段适用关键区段尺度,以工程地质稳定性评价为基调,基本比例尺1:1万~1:2.5万,目的是进一步厘定不良地质组合和重大地质风险,指导线路比选和优化;设计阶段适用工程场地尺度,聚焦具体的地质风险或工程岩体稳定性问题,基本比例尺1:2000,依据相关技术标准和专题分析研究进行专项评价。通常,随着地质风险等级从高到低,对应地质安全等级从低到高;地质安全评价结果可根据地质风险等级与防治难度划分为安全、较安全、欠安全和不安全四个等级,目前技术条件下达不到安全要求的地带应首先考虑避让。建议把地质安全评价纳入国家级工程建设管理的必要环节,并加快相关技术标准的制订。 Engineering geological evaluation is an important work to ensure the safety of major engineering construction. Facing the planning and construction needs of major projects in the new era, this paper puts forward the connotation and objectives of geological safety evaluation. Taking the railway engineering construction in plateau mountainous region as an example, the method, workflow and application examples of geological safety evaluation are discussed. Some conclusions are as follows: different stages of railway construction correspond to different evaluation scale. The regional scale, less than 1:50000, can be used in the planning stage, which is based on the evaluation of regional crustal stability, aiming to qualitatively give the railway corridor safety or suitability. In the feasibility study stage, the key segment scale, such as 1:10000~1:25000, can be used for evaluation of the engineering geological stability, so as to further determine the poor geological combination and major geological risks, and guide route optimization. In the design stage, the site scale such as 1:2000 is suitable, which is to focus on specific geological risks or engineering rock mass stability issues. Special evaluations are carried out according to relevant technical standards and thematic analysis and research. In general, as the geological risk degree goes from high to low, the corresponding geological safety degree goes from low to high. According to the level of geological risk and the difficulty of prevention and control, the geological safety evaluation results can be divided into four degrees including safe, sub-safe, relatively unsafe and unsafe. The segments, where safety requirements cannot be guaranteed under current technical conditions, should be avoided for site selection. It is suggested to incorporate geological safety evaluation into the necessary processes of national engineering construction management, and speed up the formulation of relevant technical standards.
作者 张永双 吴瑞安 郭长宝 李向全 李雪 任三绍 李金秋 ZHANG Yongshuang;WU Ruian;GUO Changbao;LI Xiangquan;LI Xue;REN Sanshao;LI Jinqiu(Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology,Chinese Academy of Geosciences,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050061,China;Key Laboratory of Quaternary Chronology and Hydro-Environmental Evolution,China Geological Survey,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050061,China;Institute of Geomechanics,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Beijing 100081,China;China University of Geosciences(Beijing),Beijing 100083,China)
出处 《地质学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期1736-1751,共16页 Acta Geologica Sinica
基金 科技部重点研发项目(编号2021YFB2301305) 国家自然科学基金重大项目(编号41941017) 中国地质调查局项目(编号DD20190505)联合资助的成果。
关键词 地质安全 地质风险 区域地壳稳定性 工程地质稳定性 评价方法 geological safety geological risk regional crustal stability engineering geological stability evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献248

共引文献575

同被引文献116

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部