我国环境公益诉讼实证分析与检视——以1663份环境公益诉讼裁判文书为样本

An Empirical Analysis and Examination of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China:On the Basis of 1663 Judgment Documents of Environmental Public Interest Litigation

通过对2015—2021年环境公益诉讼裁判文书的分析及对比,可以发现环境公益诉讼制度在我国司法实践中取得了显著成绩,形成了民事、行政和“刑附民”三种诉讼模式,但是在司法实践中还存在案件受理类型单一、具体责任承担方式不健全等突出问题。对此,应通过协同推进环境公益诉讼与生态环境损害赔偿诉讼,合理规制环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼案件适用程序,努力推进非讼纠纷解决机制在环境民事公益诉讼中的适用并深入贯彻恢复性司法理念,积极稳妥拓展新领域环境公益诉讼等相关问题,以推动我国环境公益诉讼制度的进一步深入发展。

Through the analysis and comparison of the judgment documents of environmental public interest litigation from 2015 to 2021,this study found that the environmental public interest litigation system has made remarkable achievements in China's judicial practice.However,there are still some prominent problems in judicial practice,such as the single type of case acceptance and the imperfect way of specific responsibility.To solve this problem,we should promote environmental public interest litigation and ecological environment damage compensation litigation,and reasonably regulate the application procedure of environmental criminal incidental civil public interest litigation cases,promote the application of non litigation dispute resolution mechanism,expand new areas of environmental public interest litigation.