微创手术与传统开放手术治疗脊柱创伤的临床效果对比

Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Trauma

目的 对比微创手术与传统开放手术治疗脊柱创伤的临床效果。方法 78例脊柱创伤患者随机分为两组各39例,对照组采用传统开放手术治疗,观察组采用微创手术治疗,比较两组的手术相关指标和并发症发生率。结果 观察组的术中出血量少于对照组,术后疼痛评分低于对照组,住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的并发症发生率为7.69%,低于对照组的30.77%(P<0.05)。结论 与传统开放手术相比,微创手术治疗脊柱创伤具有术中出血量少、创伤小的优势,且安全性较高。

Objective To compare the clinical effects between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery in the treatment of spinal trauma. Methods 78 patients with spinal trauma were randomly divided into two groups, with 39 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional open surgery, and the observation group was treated with minimally invasive surgery. The surgery related indicators and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss amount of the observation group was less than that of the control group, the postoperative pain score was lower than that of the control group, and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group(P <0.05). The incidence of complications of the observation group was 7.69%, lower than 30.77% of the control group(P <0.05). Conclusions Compared with traditional open surgery, minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of spinal trauma has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss amount, small trauma and high safety.