期刊文献+

基于MIPS形成方案环节的智库群体决策路径建构与应用 被引量:1

Construction and Application of Group Decision-Making Path for Think Tanks Based on MIPS-Solution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]随着有待智库解决的问题域不断拓宽,智库研究的对象变得复杂而广泛,学科交叉属性日益凸显。科学把握智库研究的基本逻辑,积极优化与探索智库决策路径尤为重要。[方法/过程]通过对逻辑层次法(MIPS)中的形成方案环节进行勾勒,本文构建了智库群体决策路径模型。该模型由汇总匹配环节与择优决策环节组成,其中汇总匹配环节包括汇总匹配工具箱等,择优决策环节包括问题认知、解析、求解和决策与统筹等模块。随后本文运用案例对其进行实证。[结果/结论]经散发疫情防控的实证环节证明,基于MIPS形成方案环节构建的智库群体决策路径模型具有合理性与可用性。 [Purpose/significance]With the increasing scope of problems to be solved by think tanks,the research objects of think tanks have become complex and extensive,and the interdisciplinary nature of think tank research has become increasingly prominent.It is particularly important to scientifically grasp the basic logic of think tank research,and actively optimize and explore new paths for think tank decision-making.[Method/process]This paper constructs the solution stage in MIPS,and builds a think tank group decision-making path model.The model consists of a summary matching stage and a merit-based decision-making stage.The summary matching stage includes the summary matching toolbox.The optimal decision-making link includes the modules of problem cognition,analysis,solution,decision-making and overall planning.Based on the theoretical model,this paper uses cases to demonstrate it.[Result/conclusion]The empirical results proves that the think tank group decision-making path model based on the MIPS-Solution is reasonable and usable.
作者 冯佳昊 陈安 Feng Jiahao;Chen An(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049;School of Public Policy and Management,UCAS,Beijing 100049;Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190)
出处 《智库理论与实践》 CSSCI 2022年第3期33-40,59,共9页 Think Tank:Theory & Practice
基金 国家社科基金后期资助项目“智库研究方法:源起、发展与建构”(项目编号:19FGLB028)研究成果之一。
关键词 智库研究 双螺旋结构 逻辑层次法(MIPS) 群体决策 think tank research double helix structure logical hierarchy method(MIPS) group decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献51

  • 1朱旭峰.中国政策精英群体的社会资本:基于结构主义视角的分析[J].社会学研究,2006(4):86-116. 被引量:44
  • 2朱旭峰.“思想库”研究:西方研究综述[J].国外社会科学,2007(1):60-69. 被引量:59
  • 3Gerardine DeSanctis,R.Brent Gallupe.A foundation for the study of group decision support systems[J].Management Science,1987,33(5):589-609.
  • 4Carey J M,Kacmar C J.The impact of communication mode and task complexity on small group performance and member satisfaction[J].Computers in Human Behavior,1997,13 (1):23-49.
  • 5Qian Xue-sen,Yu Jing-yuan,Dai Ru-wei.A new scientific field-opening complex huge system and the methodology[J].Nature Magazine,1990,13(1):3-10.
  • 6Poole,Marshall Scott,Holmes,Michael.Group decision support systems and group communication[J].Communication Research,1993,20(2):176.
  • 7Zigurs,Ilze,Buckland,Bonnie K.A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness[J].MIS Quarterly,1998,22(3):313-335.
  • 8Sillince,John A,Masoud H,Saeedi.Computer-mediated communication:problems and potentials of argumentation support systems[J].Decision Support Systems,1999,26(4):287-306.
  • 9Tung X.Bui,Francois Bodart.ARBAS:A formal language to support argmnentation in network-based organizations[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,1997,14(3):223-237.
  • 10Winterfeldt D V,Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research[M].Cambridge Universitypress,1986:90-136.

共引文献253

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部