期刊文献+

Combination of classifiers with incomplete frames of discernment 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 The methods for combining multiple classifiers based on belief functions require to work with a common and complete(closed)Frame of Discernment(Fo D)on which the belief functions are defined before making their combination.This theoretical requirement is however difficult to satisfy in practice because some abnormal(or unknown)objects that do not belong to any predefined class of the Fo D can appear in real classification applications.The classifiers learnt using different attributes information can provide complementary knowledge which is very useful for making the classification but they are usually based on different Fo Ds.In order to clearly identify the specific class of the abnormal objects,we propose a new method for combination of classifiers working with incomplete frames of discernment,named CCIF for short.This is a progressive detection method that select and add the detected abnormal objects to the training data set.Because one pattern can be considered as an abnormal object by one classifier and be committed to a specific class by another one,a weighted evidence combination method is proposed to fuse the classification results of multiple classifiers.This new method offers the advantage to make a refined classification of abnormal objects,and to improve the classification accuracy thanks to the complementarity of the classifiers.Some experimental results are given to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method using real data sets.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2022年第5期145-157,共13页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.U20B2067,61790552,61790554) Shaanxi Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars,China(No.2018JC-006)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1Catherine K. Murphy.Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems . 2000 (1)
  • 2Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences . 1982 (5)
  • 3Boudraa A,et al.Dempster-Shafer’s basic probability assignment based on fuzzy membership functions. Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis . 2004
  • 4D.Dubois,H.Prade.On several representations of anuncertain body of evidence. Fuzzy Information and DecisionProcesses . 1982
  • 5Martin A,Osswald C.A new generalization of the propor-tional conflict redistribution rule stable in terms of decision. Advances and Ap-plications of DSmT for Information Fusion . 2006
  • 6Zhun-ga Liu,Quan Pan,Jean Dezert,Arnaud Martin.??Adaptive imputation of missing values for incomplete pattern classification(J)Pattern Recognition . 2015
  • 7Jiapeng Liu,Xiuwu Liao,Jian-bo Yang.??A group decision-making approach based on evidential reasoning for multiple criteria sorting problem with uncertainty(J)European Journal of Operational Research . 2015 (3)
  • 8Mihai Cristian Florea,Anne-Laure Jousselme,éloi Bossé,Dominic Grenier.??Robust combination rules for evidence theory(J)Information Fusion . 2008 (2)
  • 9Mihai Cristian Florea,Anne-Laure Jousselme,Dominic Grenier,éloi Bossé.??Approximation techniques for the transformation of fuzzy sets into random sets(J)Fuzzy Sets and Systems . 2007 (3)
  • 10David Harmanec,George J. Klir.??MEASURING TOTAL UNCERTAINTY IN DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY: A NOVEL APPROACH(J)International Journal of General Systems . 1994 (4)

共引文献13

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部