远程异步审判的程序正当性考察

The Legitimacy of Proceedings of Remote Asynchronous Trials

远程审判以及远程异步审判的兴起均有其实践上的动因,是技术系统与社会系统以及法理系统相互作用的产物,有关远程审判的性质分歧,主要是诉讼程序之历史正当性与实践正当性之间的对立。我们应当超出这样一种对立,从诉讼程序的纯粹正当性出发,来决定我们对远程异步审判的立场。以交往行为所需要的理想言谈情境为基础,可以建构出诉讼程序之纯粹正当性。以此标准来衡量,远程异步审判基本上符合诉讼程序之纯粹正当性要求。远程异步审判突破了传统民事诉讼所遭受的空间与时间的限制,既有民事诉讼程序中因时间和空间限制而形成的制度未来必将面临变革;传统民事诉讼程序法理也将随之发生变迁与进化。

The rise of remote trial and remote asynchronous trial has its practical motivation, which is the result of the interaction of technical system, social system and legal system. The main disagreement about the nature of remote trial is the historical legitimacy and the practical legitimacy of litigation proceedings. It’ s better to go beyond such an opposition and define our attitude towards remote asynchronous trial from the perspective of pure legitimacy of the litigation proceedings. The pure legitimacy of litigation proceedings could be constructed based on the ideal speech situation required by communicative action. According to this standard, remote asynchronous trial basically meets the requirement of pure legitimacy of litigation proceedings. The remote asynchronous trial breaks through the limitation of space and time suffered by traditional civil litigation. The system formed by the limitation of time and space in the existing civil procedure will certainly face changes in the future, while the jurisprudence of traditional civil litigation will change and evolve with it.