摘要
以山西省239家传统资源型企业为样本数据,在划分商业模式创新生态化(EBMI)与技术创新生态化(ETI)匹配模式不同类型并构建匹配测度模型量化的基础上,理论分析并实证检验了转型政策调节下管理者关系对EBMI-ETI匹配模式选择产生的影响。结果显示,管理者关系对企业EBMI-ETI匹配模式类型选择的影响存在显著差异,且在转型政策的调节下,其差异性影响更为显著。即:在较高的转型政策要求下,具有紧密行业内关系的企业,倾向于选择效率导向型的EBMI-ETI匹配模式;存在紧密行业外关系的企业,更倾向于选择效果导向型的EBMI-ETI匹配模式;同时具有紧密行业内外关系的企业,有利于选择提速增效型的EBMI-ETI匹配模式,且与单一类型管理者关系的企业相比,两种关系互补(交互)更能促进提速增效型的EBMI-ETI匹配活动开展。面对转型政策要求,该研究为解决企业如何通过管理者关系选择适合推动自身转型的EBMI-ETI匹配模式,改善生态-经济效益协同增长失衡局面提供一定的借鉴。
Drawing on a sample of 239 traditional resource-based enterprises from Shanxi Province of China,based on the division of the different types of fit mode about ecologically business model innovation(EBMI)and ecologically technological innovation(ETI)as well as the quantification of them by constructing the fit measurement model,we investigate the effects of managerial ties on the fit mode of ETI and EBMI under the moderation of transitional policies.Results from empirical research show that there are significant differences in the impact of different managerial ties on the different EBMI-ETI fit mode selection,and the difference of different effect is more significant under the moderation of transitional policies.That is,under the impact of higher transitional policies,enterprises with stronger intraindustry ties are inclined to choose the efficiency-oriented EBMI-ETI fit mode;Enterprises with stronger extra-industry ties are more inclined to choose the effect-oriented EBMI-ETI fit mode;However,enterprises with stronger intra-extra industry ties together are more likely to choose efficiency-effect balanced EBMI-ETI fit mode;Moreover,compared with single type of ties,complementary(interactive)intra-extra ties are better able to bring about efficiency-effect balanced EBMI-ETI fit activities.Faced with the requirements of the transitional policies,our research provides certain practical reference for enterprises to choose an EBMI-ETI fit mode that can promote their successful transformation by optimizing and balancing managerial ties,and finally result in a balanced synergistic growth of both ecological benefits and economic benefits.
作者
张美丽
姚西龙
郭淑娟
Zhang Meili;Yao Xilong;Guo Shujuan(College of Economics&Management,Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024)
出处
《管理评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期103-118,共16页
Management Review
基金
山西省哲学社会科学规划课题(RD2200000998)
山西省高校哲学社会科学研究基地项目(RD2100003605)。