期刊文献+

共相研究的心理学进路——迈农的共相学说及其本体论意义

A Psychological Approach to Universal Research:Meinong's Universal Theory and Its Ontological Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 共相问题是西方哲学关注的重要问题,也曾在哲学史上引起广泛讨论和激烈争论,历史上关于共相的探讨中都牵扯着对本体论问题的回答。然而,各种理论尽管形态各异,却始终无法对共相的困难问题给出令人满意的回答。可喜的是,作为现代哲学革新代表人物的迈农,通过对传统共相问题的梳理和研究,从心理学角度找到了共相研究的新进路,并提出了他基于自己理解的新的共相学说,其中关于抽象、呈现的探究以及各种类型对象的分析,别出心裁又细致全面。这些学说不仅为共相问题的研究提供了新的思路,并且作为迈农的对象理论的重要组成部分,推动了现当代本体论研究的革新,具有重大的本体论意义。 As an important concern of western philosophy,the problem of universals has also caused extensive discussion and fierce debate in the history of philosophy,which involves the answers to the ontological questions.However,various theories,despite their various forms,have been unable to give satisfactory answers to the difficult questions of universalism.The good news is that Meinong,a representative of modern philosophical innovation,has found a new way of universalism research from the psychological point of view by combing and studying the problem of universalism,and put forward his new universalism theory based on his own object theory,in which the exploration of abstraction and presentation and the analysis of various types of objects are ingenious,meticulous and comprehensive.These theories provide not only a new psychological approach for the study of universals,but also an important component of Meinong's object theory to promote the innovation of modern and contemporary ontological research,thus have great ontological significance.
作者 高新民 黄云鹏 GAO Xin-min;HUANG Yun-peng(School of Marxism, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China)
出处 《徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第2期22-28,共7页 Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部规划基金项目“意向性与人工智能建模基础问题研究”(20YJA20003)。
关键词 共相 迈农 本体论 对象理论 universal Meinong Ontology Object Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1普特南.《“意义”的意义》,《逻辑与语言--分析哲学经典文选》,陈波,韩合林主编,东方出版社,2005年版,第466,473,474页.
  • 2R. C. Millikan, On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay aboutSubstance Concepts, Combridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 1 - 2.
  • 3J. Prinz, Furnishing the Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002, p. 53,p. 71, p.71,p. 89,p. 312, p. 164, p. 314, pp. 108-109, p. 119, p. 144, p. 144, p. 149, p. 149, p. 212, p. 195.
  • 4E. E. Smith and D. L. Medin, Categories and Concepts, Cam- bridge: Harvard University Press, 1981 ,p. 5.
  • 5G. Lakoff, "Cognitive Semantics", in U. Eco(ed. ), Meaning and Mental Representations, Indiana : Indiana University Press, 1988, p. 151.
  • 6E. Rosch, "Principles of Categorization", in E. Rosch et al (eds.) , Cognition and Categorization, N. J. : Lawrence Erl- baum Associates, 1978,pp. 62 - 64, p. 63.
  • 7G. L. Murphy et al, "The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coher- ence", Psychological Review, 92 ( 1985 ) , pp. 289 - 316.
  • 8J. A. Fodor, "The Current Status of the Innateness Controvery", in J. A. Fordor, Representation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 9A. Clark, Assosiative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts and Rep- resentational Challenge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1993, p. 206.
  • 10贝克莱.《人类知识原理》,关文运译,商务印书馆,1975年版,第9-10页.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部