期刊文献+

消费者水产品质量认证信号信任度的影响因素分析 被引量:1

Analysis on the influencing factors of consumer aquatic product quality certification signal trust
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水产品安全事件的频繁发生,使得消费者对水产品质量认证的关注度越发提高。消费者购买水产品过程中质量信息不完整时,销售商对水产品质量的认证信号传递可以抵消信息不对称的负面影响,降低消费者感知的风险,促进消费者和产品之间更好的匹配。本文在我国一线、沿海及内陆各省(市)进行问卷发放,对消费者水产品质量认证信号信任度的影响因素进行了实证分析。研究结果表明,消费者的收入、性别、文化程度、购买经验和风险意识以及对健康的重视程度会显著影响消费者对水产品质量认证信号的信任程度。研究结论不仅可以帮助制定水产品安全认证战略,也可以为生产者和认证机构的经营决策提供参考。 The frequent occurrence of aquatic product safety incidents makes consumers pay more and more attention to aquatic product quality certification.When consumers purchase aquatic products with incomplete quality information,distributors’signal transmission of aquatic product quality certification can offset the negative impact of information asymmetry,reduce consumers’perceived risk,and promote a better match between consumers and products.In this paper,questionnaires were distributed in China’s first line,coastal and inland provinces(cities),and the influencing factors of consumer aquatic product quality certification signal trust were empirically analyzed.The results show that consumers’income,gender,educational level,purchasing experience,risk awareness and the degree of attention to health will significantly affect consumers’trust in aquatic product quality certification signals.The research conclusions can not only help to formulate aquatic product safety certification strategy,but also provide reference for producers and certification agencies to make business decisions.
作者 王春晓 卢天麒 WANG Chun-xiao;LU Tian-qi(College of Economics and Management,Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai 201306,China)
出处 《中国渔业经济》 2022年第2期99-107,共9页 Chinese Fisheries Economics
基金 财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-47)资助。
关键词 水产品质量信号 质量认证 有序Logistic模型 aquatic product quality signal quality certification ordered logistic model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1李京梅,陈琦,姚海燕.基于选择实验法的胶州湾湿地围垦生态效益损失评估[J].资源科学,2015,37(1):68-75. 被引量:35
  • 2金建君,王志石.选择试验模型法在澳门固体废弃物管理中的应用[J].环境科学,2006,27(4):820-824. 被引量:10
  • 3翟国梁,张世秋,Kontoleon Andreas,Grosjean Pauline.选择实验的理论和应用——以中国退耕还林为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(2):235-239. 被引量:33
  • 4Lusk J, Sehroeder T C. Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steak [ J ]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2004, (2) :467 - 482.
  • 5Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist C J, Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans of GM Foods CEs with Swedish Consumers [ J ]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, ( 1 ) : 152 - 161.
  • 6Loureiro M L, Umberger W J. A Choice Experiment Model for Beef, What US Consumer Responses Tell Us about Relative Preferences for Food Safety, Cou- ntry of Origin Labeling and Traceability [ J ]. Food Policy, 2007, ( 2 ) : 496 - 514.
  • 7Conner D S, Oppenheim D. Demand for Pasture - raised Livestock Products: Results from Michigan Retail Surveys[ J]. Journal of Agribusiness, 2008, ( 1 ) : 1 - 20.
  • 8Morkbak M, Christensen T. Consumer Preferences for Safety Characteristics in Pork[ J]. British Food Journal,2010, (7) :775 - 791.
  • 9Birola E, Karousakisb K, Koundouric P. Using a Choice Experiment to Account for Preference Heterogeneity in Wetland Attributes : The Case of Che- maditida Wetland in Greece [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, (6): 145- 156.
  • 10Ortega D L, Wang H H, Olynk N J, et al. Chinese Consumers' Demand for Food Safety Attributes: A Push for Government and Industry Regulations [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2012, (2) :489 - 495.

共引文献34

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部