期刊文献+

超声药物导入联合体外冲击波治疗足跟痛的疗效观察 被引量:2

Clinical outcomes of shockwave combined ultrasound drug introduction in patients with heel pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景足跟痛可导致足踝功能障碍。体外冲击波治疗可在1~2 d内恢复日常生活,但冲击波疗法也存在疗效持续时间短的局限。超声药物导入是近年来一种较为新颖的给药方法,但目前尚未见将这种方法应用于足跟痛的治疗。目的 探究超声药物导入联合体外冲击波对于治疗足跟痛的疗效。方法 选取于2019年9月-2021年9月就诊解放军总医院第一医学中心康复医学科的足跟痛患者60例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例,两组均先进行体外冲击波治疗,1次/周。治疗组在冲击波治疗后加用超声药物(双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂)导入法治疗,时间为15 min,5次/周,共2周。对照组在体外冲击波后加用伪刺激超声,方法与治疗组相同。于治疗前、治疗1周和治疗2周后采用视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)和美国足踝外科协会后足评分量表(American Orthopaedic Foot&Ankle Society,AOFAS)评估患者疼痛程度和足踝功能。结果 两组基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组VAS评分较治疗前均显著降低,AOFAS评分均显著提高(P均<0.05);治疗组间相比,治疗1周后两组VAS和AOFAS评分差异无统计学意义,治疗2周后治疗组VAS分数显著低于对照组(3.36±1.00 vs 4.29±1.06),AOFAS分数显著高于对照组(80.22±8.73 vs 71.44±7.58)(P均<0.05)。结论 超声药物导入联合体外冲击波治疗及单纯冲击波治疗均能有效降低足跟痛患者疼痛并改善足踝功能,但联合治疗疗效更佳,推荐治疗周期至少2周。 Background Talalgia can lead to ankle dysfunction. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy can help patients recover to daily life within 1 to 2 days, but shockwave therapy also has the limitation of the short curative effect duration. Ultrasound drug delivery is an innovative drug delivery method in recent years, but it has not been applied to the treatment of talalgia. Objective To observe the changes in pain intensity and ankle function before and after treatment in talalgia patients, and test whether ultrasound drug introduction combined with shockwave is a more effective therapy than shockwave alone. Methods From September 2019 to September 2021, 60 patients with talalgia in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. Patients in the two groups were both treated by shock wave treatment, with the duration of 15 min,1 time per week. After shockwave treatment, the treatment group was given ultrasound drug introduction treatment(diclofenac diethylamine emulgel) for 15 min, 5 times per week for 2 weeks, while the control group had sham stimulation ultrasound drug introduction with the same method as the treatment group. Visual Analog Scale Score(VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot &Ankle Society(AOFAS) were applied to evaluate the pain degree and ankle function before, at 1-and 2 weeks after treatment.Results There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups. After treatment, the VAS score of the two groups decreased significantly over time, while the AOFAS score increased significantly. There was no significant difference in VAS and AOFAS scores between the two groups at 1 week after treatment, however, the differences were significant at 2 weeks after treatment(VAS: 3.36±1.00 vs 4.29±1.06;AOFAS: 80.22±8.73 vs 71.44±7.58;P<0.05, respectively). Conclusion Ultrasound drug delivery combined with shockwave can relieve the pain and improve the ankle function in patients with heel pain, which may be used as a comprehensive clinical treatment for talalgia patients, and the treatment cycle is suggested to be two weeks at least.
作者 耿雨涵 黄丽萍 张晓倓 张攻孜 李军 丘晓娟 张立宁 谢惠敏 GENG Yuhan;HUANG Liping;ZHANG Xiaotan;ZHANG Gongzi;LI Jun;QIU Xiaojuan;ZHANG Lining;XIE Huimin(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,the First Medical Center,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Sanya 572000,Hainan Province,China;Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Military Training Injury of PLA,Beijing 100853,China)
出处 《解放军医学院学报》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第4期395-399,共5页 Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School
基金 国家重点研发计划(2019YFB1311400) 军事创新医学项目(CX19005) 解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金(2018FC-WJFWZS-2-21)。
关键词 体外冲击波 超声药物导入 足跟痛 VAS评分 AOFAS评分 extracorporeal shockwave ultrasound drug delivery heel pain VAS score AOFAS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献99

  • 1黄广林,刘流.体外冲击波在骨科的应用[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(4):222-226. 被引量:10
  • 2朱宏骞,熊东林,陈葵好,缪映香,张德仁.高能体外冲击波治疗慢性足底筋膜炎[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(1):86-89. 被引量:6
  • 3[1]Bommannan D, Okuyama H, Stauffer P, et al. Sonophoresis. I. The use of high-frequency ultrasound to enhance transdermal drug delivery[J]. Pharm Res, 1992, 9(4): 559.
  • 4[2]Meidan VM, Walmsley AD, Docker MF, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced diffusion into coupling gel during phonophoresis of 5-fluorouracil[J]. Int J Pharm, 1999, 185(2): 205.
  • 5[3]Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, Langer R. A mechanistic study of ultrasonically-enhanced transdermal drug delivery[J]. J Pharm. Sci, 1995, 84(6): 697.
  • 6[4]Tachibana K. Transdermal delivery of insulin to alloxan-diabetic rabbits by ultrasound exposure[J]. Pharm Res, 1992, 9(7): 952.
  • 7[5]Tezel A, Sens A, Tuchscherer J, et al. Frequency dependence of sonophoresis[J]. Pharm Res, 2001, 18(12): 1694.
  • 8[6]Kost J, Mitragotri S, Gabbay R, et al. Transdermal monitoring of glucose and other analytes using ultrasound[J]. Nature Med, 2000, 6(3): 347.
  • 9[7]Mitragotri S, Kost J. Transdermal delivery of heparin and low-molecular weight heparin using low frequency ultrasound[J]. Pharm Res, 2001, 18(8): 1151.
  • 10[8]Asano J, Suisha F, Takada M, et al. Effect of pulsed output ultrasound on the transdermal absorption of indomethacin from an ointment in rats[J]. Biol Pharm Bull, 1997, 20(3): 288.

共引文献71

同被引文献20

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部