在场与出场:乡村振兴中农民主体性的回归与实现

Presence and Appearance: Regression and Realization of Farmers’ Subjectivity in Rural Revitalization

自乡村振兴战略提出以来,关于农民主体性的传统话语被重新带回了乡村振兴的知识生产之中,但概念层面的模糊与语言所指的差异在某种程度上影响了我们对乡村振兴中农民主体性的真实解读,故而回归农民主体性的语汇生产成为乡村振兴研究之必要,以“身体在场”“行动在场”“价值在场”三个层面对乡村振兴的农民主体性予以内涵赋值。在日渐凸显的“内卷化”的学术建构中,亟须摆脱主导与主体、科学与经验非此即彼的路径依赖与思维惯性,在可行能力与赋权理论的知识观照下,以政治赋能和现实语境重新体认农民在乡村振兴中的优势与使命,并在“组织赋能”“技术赋能”“生态赋能”的乡村叙事中得以证成。

Since the rural revitalization strategy is initiated, the traditional discourse was brought back to the rural revitalization of knowledge production, but the concept level of fuzzy and language differences to some extent affect our real interpretation of rural farmers’ subjectivity, Therefore, vocabulary production regression to farmers’ subjectivity becomes necessary for rural revitalization research. The connotation of farmers’ subjectivity in rural revitalization should be assigned from the three hierarchical levels of “physical presence”, “action presence” and “value presence”. In the increasingly prominent “involution” of academic construction, it is urgent to get rid of the path dependence and inertial thinking in which the leading role and the subject position are mutually exclusive, so are science and experience. With the guidance of capability approach and empowerment theory, the advantages and missions of farmers in rural revitalization shall be re-recognized by political empowerment and realistic context, and be proved in rural narratives of “organizational empowerment”, “technical empowerment” and “ecological empowerment”.