摘要
Background:Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the automated computer-based Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score(e-ASPECTS)for acute stroke patients and compare the result with physicians at different levels.Methods:In our center,e-ASPECTS and 9 physicians at different levels retrospectively and blindly assessed baseline computed tomography(CT)images of 55 patients.Sensitivity,specificity,receiver-operating characteristic curves,Bland–Altman plots with mean score error,and Matthews correlation coefficients were calculated.Comparisons were made between the scores by physicians and e-ASPECTS with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)being the ground truth.Two methods for clustered data were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity in the region-based analysis.Results:In total,1100(55 patients×20 regions per patient)ASPECTS regions were scored.In the region-based analysis,sensitivity of e-ASPECTS was better than junior doctors and residents(0.576 vs 0.165 and 0.111,p<0.05)but inferior to senior doctors(0.576 vs 0.617).Specificity was lower than junior doctors and residents(0.883 vs 0.971 and 0.914)but higher than senior doctors(0.883 vs 0.809,p<0.05).E-ASPECTS had the best Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.529,compared to senior doctors,junior doctors,and residents(0.463,0.251,and 0.087,respectively).Conclusions:e-ASPECTS showed a similar performance to that of senior physicians in the assessment of brain CT of acute ischemic stroke patients with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score method.
基金
supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC1301500)
Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme(QML20170502)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2020-YJ-008).