期刊文献+

人格权禁令之交错属性及程序设计

The Alternation Attribute and Procedure Design of the Injunction of Personality Right
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民事诉讼法所面临的人格权禁令制度的协调和对接问题愈发紧迫。人格权禁令自身呈现出实体与程序、诉讼与非讼的交错法律属性,以有着公正要求的效率为价值导向,提出了交错适用诉讼与非讼法理的要求。“程序—法官—当事人”的三角作用构造可提供填补程序规则空白的理论与技术指引。在制定人格权禁令程序规则时,应当重视程序本身的作用空间,以及其与法官、当事人作用空间的关系,在实现程序功能与目的的基础上进行调节。 The coordination and connection of the injunctive system of personality right in the civil procedure law is becoming more and more urgent.The injunction of personality right itself presents the attribute of legal alternation between entity and procedure,litigation and non-litigation,putting forward the requirements of alternation in the application of litigation and non-litigation jurisprudence with the efficiency of justice as the value orientation.The triangular structure of“procedure-judge-party”can provide theoretical and technical guidance to fill the blank of procedural rules.When making the procedural rules of the injunction of personality right,attention should be paid to the function space of the procedure itself,and the relationship between the function space of the judge and the parties,and adjust the procedure on the basis of realizing the function and purpose of the system.
作者 沈超 SHEN Chao(School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210093,China)
机构地区 南京大学法学院
出处 《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第3期24-32,共9页 Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 人格权禁令 交错适用 准诉讼程序 injunction of personality right alternation in application quasi-litigation procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献303

  • 1王祥远.试论非讼程序与程序保障[J].四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2007,22(6):41-44. 被引量:1
  • 2杨联华.简论英国注重程序法的缘由[J].比较法研究,1991,5(4):47-49. 被引量:11
  • 3江伟,肖建国.民事诉讼中的行为保全初探[J].政法论坛,1994,12(3):56-59. 被引量:70
  • 4[美]诺曼·维拉.宪法公民权[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
  • 5[德]汉斯-约阿希姆·穆泽拉克.德国民事诉讼法教程[M].周翠.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 6Mauro Cappelletti, William Cohen, Comparative Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials, The Bobbs -Merrill Company, Inc. 1979.
  • 7[德]施蒂尔纳.德国民事诉讼法学文萃[M].赵秀举.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 8Richard Clayton and Hugh Tomlinson. Fair Trial Rights. Oxford University Press,2001.
  • 9台湾地区民事诉讼法研究会.民事诉讼法之研讨(一)[M].台北:三民书局有限公司,1986.
  • 10Richard Clayton and Hugh Tomlinson , Fair Trial Rights , Oxford University Press ,2001 ,p27.

共引文献543

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部