摘要
文章以新《档案法》第二条为例,在比较分析法理档案定义和学理档案定义的基础上,认为现行的法理档案定义体现了新《档案法》对国家治理理念和内容变化的遵循,其与学理档案定义均采用了以真实定义为主、发生定义和功用定义为辅的定义方法,且均属于抽象揭示型定义。二者分属于实践和理论两个层面,前者的地位和功能也决定了应使用直观描述的模式,采用发生定义的方式去界定法理档案定义。
On the basis of a comparative analysis of legal archives definition and academic archives definition, this paper takes Article 2 of the new Archives Law as an example, argues that current legal archives definition reflects the fact that the new Archives Law follows the concept of national governance and its content changes.Both legal archives definition and academic archives definition are abstract revealing definitions that adopt the definition method which based on real definition and supplemented by genetic definition and functional definition, belonging to practical and theoretical levels. The status and the function of the legal archives definition dictate that it should be defined by using genetic definition in the mode of intuitive description.
作者
孙大东
吴怡娇
Sun Dadong;Wu Yijiao(School of Information Management of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001)
出处
《档案与建设》
北大核心
2022年第6期13-15,共3页
Archives & Construction
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“档案术语与档案学科协同演化机理研究”(项目编号:21BTQ110)阶段性研究成果。
关键词
法理档案定义
学理档案定义
新《档案法》
Legal Archives Definition
Academic Archives Definition
New Archives Law
