期刊文献+

M310电厂小破口失水事故最佳估算加不确定性分析研究

Best-estimation Plus Uncertainty Analysis of Small Break Superposition Loss with Off-Site Power Accident in M310 Power Plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 最佳估算加不确定性分析(BEPU)方法已成为国内外对核电厂进行事故分析或安全评审的重要方式。对M310电厂小破口叠加失去厂外电事故工况进行不确定性量化分析。采用RELAP5程序建立M310电厂模型,并进行稳态计算和事故瞬态验证。建立SBLOCA重要参数表,进行非参数统计抽样和不确定性分析,计算得到目标参数的不确定性输出区间,并通过敏感性分析评估了影响较大的输入参数。 The Best-estimate Plus Uncertainty Analysis(BEPU)method has become an important method for accident analysis or safety review of nuclear power plants.In this paper,the uncertainty analysis of small break superposition loss with off-site power accident condition in M310 power plant is carried out.The simulation model of the power plant is established by using the RELAP5 program,and the steady state calculation and transient verification under accident conditions are performed.The important parameter table of small break superposition loss with off-site power accident condition is established,and the non-parametric statistical sampling method and uncertainty analysis are performed,so that the uncertainty output interval of the target parameter is obtained.The influential input parameters are evaluated by sensitivity analysis.
作者 陈昊 黄亚平 唐涛 郝朋飞 CHEN Hao;HUANG Yaping;TANG Tao;HAO Pengfei(China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100142,China)
出处 《电工技术》 2022年第9期174-176,共3页 Electric Engineering
关键词 最佳估算 不确定性分析 BEPU 敏感性分析 小破口失水事故 M310 best-estimate uncertainty analysis BEPU sensitivity analysis small break superposition loss M310
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Best esti- mate calculations of emergency core cooling sys- tem performance, Regulatory Guide 1. 157[R]. USA: NRC, 1989.
  • 2BOYACK B E, CATTON I, DUFFEY R B, et al. Quantifying reactor safety margins, Part 1: An overview of the code scaling, applicability, and uncertainty evaluation methodology[J]. Nu- clear Engineering and Design, 1990, 119: 1-15.
  • 3FRIEND M T, WRIGHT R F, HUNDAL R, et al. Simulated AP600 response to small-break loss-of-coolant-accident and non-loss-of-coolant accident events Analysis of SPES-2 integral test results[J]. Nuclear Technology, 1998, 22: 19- 42.
  • 4KUKITA Y, YONOMOTO T. ROSA/AP600 testing facility modifications and initial test results[J].Nuclear Science and Technology, 1996, 33: 259-265.
  • 5REYES J N, HOCHREITER L E. AP600 low- pressure integral systems test at Oregon State University: Facility scaling report, WCAP-14270[R]. USA: Westing House, 1995.
  • 6CRECY A, 13AZIN P, GLAESER H, et al. Un- certainty and sensitivity analysis of the LOFT L2-5 test: Results of the BEMUSE programme[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2008, 238: 3 561-3 578.
  • 7WILKS S S. Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits[J].Annuals of Mathe- matical Statistics, 1941, 12: 91-96.
  • 8GLAESER H, HOFER E, KLOOS M, et al. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a post- experiment calculation in thermal hydraulics[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1994, 45: 19-33.
  • 9GUBA A, MAKAI M, PAL L. Statistical as- pects of best estimate method-1 [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003, 80: 217- 232.
  • 10Applied Programming Technology Inc. Uncer- tainty analysis user' s manual: Symbolic nuclear analysis package[R]. USA: Applied Program- ming Technology Inc., 2012.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部