期刊文献+

教学学术视角下加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学教师教学同行评议探析 被引量:6

A probe into the Peer Review of the University of British Columbia in Canada Teacher’s Teaching from the Perspective of Scholarship of Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 同行评议是高校教师教学评价的重要方式之一,事关教师专业发展和学生学习成效。文章以教学学术为理论支撑,通过对加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学教师教学同行评议的管理机构与评价主体、评价内容与指标体系、评价方式与评价程序抽丝剥茧地进行分析,提出优化我国高校教师教学同行评议的路径:健全评价机构管理,加强同行评议队伍建设;规范同行评议过程,细化同行评议指标;落实教学学术导向,完善同行评议制度。 Peer review is one of the most important ways of teaching evaluation of college teachers,which is related to the quality of teaching,the direction of teacher development and the effectiveness of student learning.Based on the theoretical support of teaching academics,through the analysis of the management organization and evaluation subject,evaluation content and indicator system,evaluation form and evaluation procedure of the teaching peer review of the University of British Columbia,Canada,we propose ways to strengthen the teaching peer review of Chinese colleges path:Improve the evaluation management organization,strengthen the construction of peer review team;standardize the peer review process,soften the peer review teaching index system;improve the peer review method,and implement the teaching academic review guide.
作者 欧阳光华 黄姜燕 刘红姣 OUYANG Guang-hua;HUANG Jiang-yan;LIU Hong-jiao(Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《黑龙江高教研究》 北大核心 2022年第5期83-88,共6页 Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
基金 全国教育科学规划国家级项目“教学学术视域下美国高校教师教学评价研究”(编号:BDA210080)。
关键词 教学同行评议 教学学术 教学评价 英属哥伦比亚大学 peer assessment of teaching scholarship of teaching teaching evaluation University of British Columbia
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献88

  • 1王富平.教育研究成果分类问题的探讨[J].上海教育科研,1996(10):1-4. 被引量:2
  • 2克拉克·科尔.大学的功用[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,1993.23.
  • 3Ernest I.. BoErnest L. Boyer. Scholarship Re considered.. Priorities of the Professorate. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1990.
  • 4Roger Boshier. Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell'?. Higher Education ResearchDevelopment. 28(1 ). March2009.1 15.
  • 5Kreber, C. The scholarship of teaching and learning No one way. Interchange, Summer 2007. Retrieved from: http: //www. tla. ed. ac. uk/interchange/summer2007/kreberl. pdf.
  • 6Kreber, C. Conceptualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Identifying Unresolved Isues: The Frame work for This Volume[J]. New Directions for Teaching and I.earning, Vol. 2001,(86): 1--18.
  • 7Braxton, J. , Luckey, W. , & Helland, P. (2002). In stitutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer' s four domains. (ASHE ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 29 6). San Francisco, CA: Jossey--Bass.
  • 8What is the Scholarship o/" Teaching and [.earning in Higher Education? https= // www. google, com. hk/search? new window = 1 q = What + is + t he + Scholarship-}- of ff Teach ing+ and+ Learning + (SoTl.) q- in - Higher + Education A 3F&ie = utf -- 8&gws- rd cr, ssl&-ei -- 9Kt6VcqvDMXFmAWDTI(7opIA.
  • 9Cambridge, B. (2001). Fostering the Scholarship of Teach ing and Learning: Communities of Practice. Pps. 3--16 in To Improve the Academy. D. Lieberman and C. Wehlburg, Eds. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • 10Martin, E. , Benjamin, J. , Prosser, M. , and Trigwell, K. (1999). Scholarship of Teaching: A Study of the Approa ches of Academic Staff. PPS. 326 -- 331 in Improving Student Learning: Improving Student Learning Outcomes. C. Rust (ed.). Oxford Oxford (;entre for Staff l.earning and Development, Oxford Brookes University.

共引文献61

同被引文献52

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部