期刊文献+

糖尿病ICD-10与ICD-11编码比较

Comparison of ICD-10 and ICD-11 Coding in Diabetes Mellitus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 结合疾病诊断的临床指南,对比分析明确ICD-11中糖尿病相关内容与现行ICD-10之间的编码差异,希望为ICD-11的推广应用和国内卫生信息化建设提供借鉴和参考。方法 用表格对糖尿病类型及并发症编码进行映射,比较ICD-11与ICD-10分类体系中存在的差异。结果 糖尿病类型在ICD-10与ICD-11中都是类目的分类轴心,ICD-11对糖尿病进行了改变和添加,取消了星剑号双重分类系统,并发症在ICD-11中被分类在不同章节,添加了主干码、扩展码、后组配等新概念。结论 通过对比糖尿病在ICD-10与ICD-11中的差异,学习探讨ICD-11中章节内容、编码组配形式、信息更新等方面的变化,在实践中不断学习,为ICD-11的推广应用做好准备工作。 Objective To compare and analyze the coding differences between diabetes related content in ICD-11 and current ICD-10 based on clinical guidelines for disease diagnosis,hoping to provide reference for the promotion and application of ICD-11 and the construction of health informatization in China.Methods Diabetes types and complication codes were mapped by table,and the differences between ICD-11 and ICD-10 classification systems were compared.Results Diabetes type was the axis of category classification in ICD-10 and ICD-11.Icd-11 changed and added diabetes,cancelled the double classification system of Star Sword.Complications were classified in different chapters in ICD-11,and new concepts such as trunk code,extension code and post-combination were added.Conclusion By comparing the differences between ICD-10 and ICD-11,the changes of chapter content,code composition and information updating in ICD-11 were studied,and the continuous learning in practice was prepared for the promotion and application of ICD-11.
作者 桂强 刘辰雨 孟洁 Gui Qiang;Liu Chenyu;Meng Jie(Department of Medical Records,Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China;不详)
出处 《中国病案》 2022年第6期49-52,共4页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 糖尿病 类型 并发症 ICD-10 ICD-11 Diabetes Type Complications ICD-10 ICD-11
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献55

  • 1董志光,肖温温.妊娠后半期孕妇口服葡萄糖耐量试验的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,1993,28(3):136-138. 被引量:73
  • 2杨慧霞.妊娠期糖尿病的筛查与诊断[J].中华围产医学杂志,2005,8(5):316-317. 被引量:57
  • 3American Diabetes Association.Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010.Diabetes Care,2010,33(Suppl 1):S11-S61.
  • 4Yang H,Wei Y,Gao X,et al.Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women:a prospective study of 16,286 pregnant women in China.Diabet Med,2009,26:1099-1104.
  • 5HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group,Metzger BE,Lowe LP,et al.Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes.N Engl J Med,2008,358:1991-2002.
  • 6HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group.The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome(HAPO)Study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2002,78:69-77.
  • 7Bellamy L,Casas JP,Hingorani AD,et al.Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes,a systematic review and recta-analysis.Lancet,2009,373:1773-1779.
  • 8Hadar E,Oats J,Hod M.Towards new diagnostic criteria for diagnosing GDM-the HAPO study.J Perinat Med,2009,37:447-449.
  • 9International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel.International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy.Diabetes Care,2010,33:676-682.
  • 10O'Sullivan JB,Mahan CM,Boston AB.Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy.Diabetes,1964,13:278-285.

共引文献195

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部