期刊文献+

不同药物治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症伴间歇性跛行有效性和安全性的网状Meta分析 被引量:6

Efficacy and safety of different drugs for the treatment of intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease: a network meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 系统评价不同药物治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症伴间歇性跛行的有效性和安全性。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Scopus、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、WanFang Data和VIP数据库,搜集不同药物治疗间歇性跛行患者的随机对照试验,检索时限均从建库至2021年12月31日。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Stata 16.0软件进行网状Meta分析。结果 共纳入36个研究,涉及西洛他唑等扩血管药物,阿托伐他汀等降脂药物,沙格雷酯等抗血小板聚集药物及左旋肉碱、别嘌呤醇等其他类型药物。Meta分析结果显示:辛伐他汀、苄环烷、雷米普利改善无痛步行距离效果优于西洛他唑等药物(P<0.05),其中苄环烷的疗效最为突出,同时辛伐他汀、雷米普利在最大步行距离的改善方面同样优于西洛他唑等药物(P<0.05),而西洛他唑与其他药物的疗效均无统计学差异(P>0.05);在不良反应方面,伊洛前列素的安全性劣于其他药物,而舒洛地特的耐受性最好。结论 现有证据显示苄环烷是改善下肢动脉硬化闭塞症间歇性跛行患者无痛步行距离较好的药物,辛伐他汀、雷米普利是改善最大步行距离较好的药物,但以上药物安全性均较差。综合而言,舒洛地特和左旋肉碱可能是治疗间歇性跛行较为理想的药物。受纳入研究数量和质量限制,上述结论尚需开展更多高质量研究予以验证。 Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of different drugs for the treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Methods The PubMed, Scopus, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease from database inception to December 31st, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software. Results A total of 36 studies were included, which involved vasodilators(i.e., cilostazol), lipid-lowering agents(i.e., atorvastatin), antiplatelet drugs(i.e.,sarpogrelate), and other types of medicine(i.e., L-carnitine and allopurinol). The results of meta-analysis showed that the effects of simvastatin, bencyclane, and ramipril were superior to cilostazol and other drugs in improving PFWD, among which bencyclane was the most efficient. Besides, simvastatin and ramipril were also superior to cilostazol and other drugs in improving MWD(P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between cilostazol and other drugs(P>0.05). In terms of adverse events, iloprost was inferior to other drugs, while sulodexide was better tolerated.Conclusion Bencyclane is a preferred choice to improve PFWD for the treatment of IC due to PAD, simvastatin and ramipril to improve MWD;however, their safety is poor. Overall, sulodexide and L-carnitine are ideal medicines for IC.Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
作者 梁新雨 冯夏 高玉杰 徐洪涛 王御震 赵诚 曹烨民 LIANG Xinyu;FENG Xia;GAO Yujie;XU Hongtao;WANG Yuzhen;ZHAO Cheng;CAO Yemin(Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,P.R.China;Department of Pain,Shanghai Yangsi Hospital,Shanghai 202126,P.R.China;Department of Vascular Surgery,Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital,Shanghai,200082,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期655-666,共12页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家重大专项基金项目(编号:2019ZX09201004-002-091) 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:82174382) 上海市科技创新行动计划专项资金项目(编号:20Z21900200)。
关键词 下肢动脉硬化闭塞症 间歇性跛行 药物治疗 步行能力 网状Meta分析 随机对照试验 Peripheral arterial disease Intermittent claudication Drug therapy Walk ability Network meta-analysis Randomized controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献119

  • 1Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. StatMed, 2002, 21(16): 2313-2324.
  • 2R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
  • 3van Valkenhoef G, Kuiper J. gemtc: Network Meta-Analysis Using Bayesian Methods. R package version 0.6-1. Available at: http:// CRAN.R-project.org/package=gemtc.
  • 4Brooks SP, Roberts GO. Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Star Comput, 1998, 8(4): 319-335.
  • 5Toft N, Innocent GT, Gettinby G, et al. Assessing the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: an example from evaluation of diagnostic tests in absence of a gold standard. Prey Vet Med, 2007, 79(2): 244-256.
  • 6Roberts GO, Rosenthal JS. Examples of adaptive MCMC. J Comput Graph Stat, 2009, 18(2): 349-367.
  • 7Inc, SAS Institute. SAS/STAT~ 9.2 User's Guide, Second Edition[EB/ OLJ. 2009.
  • 8Crosbie S, Corliss D. Are You Dense? Using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) to Connect the Dots Amidst Uncertainty. 2012.
  • 9Turlach BA. Bandwidth selection in kernel density estimation: A review. Universit~ catholique de Louvain, 1993.
  • 10Jones MC, Marron JS, Sheather SJ. A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estimation, l Am Star Assoc, 1996, 91 (433): 401- 407.

共引文献415

同被引文献146

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部