四库底本与文渊阁本《蚓窍集》版本问题辨

Distinguish Between the Original Version of Siku and Wenyuange's Yinqiaoji Version

《蚓窍集》存世版本不多,现存最早刻本为永乐本。据《总目》言,清修《四库全书》将永乐本抄入库书之中。然《总目》所述与库书之间存在差异,也就是四库本与原刊本并不相同。上海图书馆藏四库底本《蚓窍集》,这一底本的发现,解决了《总目》与库书差异性的原因。继而引发问题,四库底本与阁本《蚓窍集》孰优孰劣。赵万里跋永乐刊本《蚓窍集》称,四库本存在三大问题,直指库本讹谬。事实上,赵氏跋文存在臆测的成分,并无实据。从赵氏行文或可看出,其应该经眼过四库底本,因而仅依据底本馆臣删削之痕进行分析,而并未核对库书。赵氏跋文所论,实际上是一种先入为主的“误判”,这从某种程度上显示出学界对四库本的错误认知。

There are not many extant editions of Yinqiao Ji,and the earliest extant engraved edition is the Yongle edition.According to the Zongmu,the Siku Quanshu in the Qing Dynasty which copied the Yongle version into the library book.However,there are differences between the General Catalogue and the library books,that is,the Siku version is not the same as the original version.The discovery of the original copy of the four libraries,Yinqiao Ji,has solved the reason for the difference between the General Catalogue and the library books.The question then arises as to which one is better or worse than the original version of the Siku and the pavilion version of the Yinqiao Ji.Zhao Wanli's postscript Yongle's edition of Yinqiao Ji stated that there are three major problems in the Siku edition,which directly points to the error of the Kuben.In fact,Zhao's postscript is speculative and has no actual evidence.From Zhao's writing,it may be seen that he should have seen the original manuscript of the Siku,so he only analyzed the traces of deletion by the officials of the original manuscript,but did not check the library books.Zhao's postscript is actually a preconceived misjudgment,which to some extent shows the academic circle's misunderstanding of the Siku edition.