《四库全书总目·经部》元人著作提要辨误七则

Revising the seven errors in the works of Confucianism by scholars of the Yuan Dynasty evaluated by the Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu

《四库全书总目》虽为中国古典目录学史上的集大成之作,但疏误也在所难免。前辈学者已做了大量的辨误工作,然尚有错误未被纠正,且个别辨误还需通过论据的补充来增加考辨的说服力。今就经部元人著作提要发现的错误考辨为七则,分为三类:一是书名记载错误。《周易本义启蒙翼传》,《四库全书总目》误作《易学启蒙翼传》;《春秋阙疑》,《四库全书总目》误作《春秋经传阙疑》。二是作者记载错误。《书义断法》作者应作邹次陈,或作邹悦道,《四库全书总目》误作陈悦道。三是作者生平经历论述错误。曾贯官绍兴路照磨,《四库全书总目》误作绍兴府照磨;王充耘授承事郎,《四库全书总目》误作承务郎;赵汸师从黄泽习得“六经”传注疑义千馀条,《四库全书总目》误作十馀条;余载为元文宗天历中人,《四库全书总目》误作元仁宗天历中人。这也提醒我们,在研读提要的过程中,切不可盲信馆臣的论述。在使用《四库全书总目》时,要辩证地看待其学术价值。

Although SiKuQuanShu ZongMu is a masterpiece in the history of Chinese classical bibliography,and their errors are inevitable.Senior scholars have done a lot of work to distinguish the errors,but there are still some errors that have not been revised,and the correction of individual errors also requires supplementary evidence to increase persuasiveness.There are seven mistakes found in the summary of the works of the Yuan Dynasty:The Original Meaning of Zhouyi Enlightenment Yizhuan,and the title of the SiKuQuanShu ZongMu was mistaken as The Yixue Enlightenment Yizhuan;Zeng Guan's official position is Shaoxing Lu Zhaomo,SiKuQuanShu ZongMu was mistaken as Shaoxing Prefecture Zhaomo;Wang Chongyun awarded Chengshi Lang,and the Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu was mistaken as Chengwu Lang;the author of The Judgment of Book Righteousness was Zou Cichen,SiKuQuanShu ZongMu was mistaken for Chen Yuedao;the title of Chunqiu Que Yi and the SiKuQuanShu ZongMu was mistaken as Chuanqiu Jing Zhuan Que Yi;Zhao Fang learned more than a thousand doubts about the"Six Classics"from Huang Ze.SiKuQuaShu ZongMu was mistaken for more than ten articles;Yu Zai was a member of the Yuan Wenzong Tianli,and the"General SiKuQuanShu ZongMu was mistaken as a member of the Yuan Renzong Tianli.