期刊文献+

双层探测器光谱CT多参数成像在术前预测胃腺癌淋巴结转移中的价值分析 被引量:5

Value of dual-layer spectral detector CT in preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新型双层探测器光谱CT多参数成像术前预测胃腺癌淋巴结转移的价值。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年1月经新型双层探测器光谱CT检查且术后病理确诊为胃腺癌的130例患者的临床、病理及影像资料,男93例,女37例,年龄37~84(63±9)岁。根据淋巴结转移状态分为淋巴结转移组(104例)和非淋巴结转移组(26例)。测量光谱CT图像上胃癌肿瘤最大径、动静脉期40、50、60、70 keV单能量图像中病灶的CT值(表示为CT40 keV、CT50_(keV)、CT60_(keV)、CT_(70ke))、碘浓度(IC)、有效原子序数(Zeff),并计算标准化碘浓度(NIC)值及光谱曲线斜率(K_((40-70)))。比较两组间各光谱参数的差异,并构建logistic回归模型。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及计算曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异度及最佳阈值以衡量每个参数的诊断效能,使用Delong检验比较各AUC的差异。结果转移淋巴结组在光谱CT上静脉期CT40_(keV)、CT50_(keV)、CT60_(keV)、CT70_(keV)、IC值、NIC值、Zeff、K_((40-70))及肿瘤最大径、分化程度较低、病理T分期较高、癌胚抗原阳性占比均高于非淋巴结转移组[其中代表性参数为静脉期Z_(eff):8.4(8.2,8.5)比8.2(8.1,8.3);癌胚抗原阳性占比:34.6%(36/104)比7.7%(2/26)](均P<0.05)。由癌胚抗原和静脉期VZ_(eff)联合构建的回归模型预测淋巴结转移的诊断价值高于其他各参数,其中最佳参数回归联合模型的AUC、灵敏度、特异度分别为0.835(0.759~0.894)、83.65%、73.08%。结论双层探测器光谱CT静脉期各参数及CEA有助于术前预测胃腺癌淋巴结转移,其中多参数联合模型具有更高诊断价值。 Objective To investigate the value of dual-layer spectral detector CT(SDCT)in preoperative prediction of lymph node(LN)metastasis of gastric cancer.Methods From January 2019 to January 2021,the clinical and imaging data of 130 gastric cancer patients(93 males and 37 females,aged from 37 to 84 years)confirmed by pathology in the Zhongshan hospital of Xiamen University were retrospectively collected.According to the status of lymph node metastasis,those patients were divided into metastatic LNs group(n=104)and nonmetastatic LNs group(n=26).The maximum diameter of gastric cancer on spectral CT images,CT Values of lesions in 40,50,60,70.KeV monoenergetic image of arterial and Venous phase(CT40 keV,CT50 keV,CT60 keV,CT70 keV),iodine concentration(IC)and effective atomic number(Zeff)were measured,then the normalized IC(NIC)and spectral curve(K(40-70))value were calculated.The differences of each parameter derived from spectral CT between the two groups were compared,and a logistic regression model was constructed.The ROC curves and area under the curve(AUC)were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each parameter and Delong test was used to compare the difference of each AUC.Results Compared to nonmetastatic LNs group,metastatic LNs group had higher maximum diameter of tumor,CT40_(keV),CT50_(keV),CT60_(keV),CT70_(keV),IC,NIC,Zeff,and K_((40-70))values on venous phase(the representative parameter is Z_(eff):8.4(8.2,8.5)vs 8.2(8.1,8.3))(all P<0.05).The proportion of patients with lower histology differentiated degree,higher T grade and positive carcino embryonic antigen(CEA)were higher than that in nonmetastatic LNs(the representative parameter was CEA:34.6%(36/104)vs 7.7%(2/26)(all P<0.05)).The regression model constructed by CEA and Zeff had the highest predictive value in predicting metastatic LNs,with an AUC of 0.835(0.759-0.894),sensitivity and specificity of 83.65%and 73.08%,respectively.Conclusion SDCT quantitative parameters on venous phase and CEA facilitate the accurate prediction of metastatic LNs in patients with gastric cancer,and the multi-parameter regression model has the highest diagnostic performance.
作者 洪燕玲 张雨珊 叶锋 刘争进 康江河 王金岸 曾强 Hong Yanling;Zhang Yushan;Ye Feng;Liu Zhengjin;Kang Jianghe;Wang Jin′an;Zeng Qiang(Department of Radiology,Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University,School of Medicine,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361000,China)
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第23期1747-1752,共6页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 福建省自然科学基金(2020J011216) 厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20214ZD1032)。
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 胃肿瘤 淋巴结转移 横断面研究 Tomography,X-ray computed Gastric neoplasms Lymph node metastasis Cross-sectional study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1Cunningham D,Allum WH,Stenning SP,菅鑫妍.手术期间化学疗法与单独手术治疗可切除的胃食管癌疗效比较[J].中国处方药,2006,5(8):59-60. 被引量:435
  • 2Edip Ucar,Ersan Semerci,Hasan Ustun,Tugba Yetim,Can Huzmeli,Murat Gullu.Prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA 19-9, CA 72-4, and AFP levels in gastric cancer[J].Advances in Therapy.2008(10)
  • 3Katie Wing‐keiLam,Samuel Chun‐lapLo.Discovery of diagnostic serum biomarkers of gastric cancer using proteomics[J].Prot Clin Appl.2008(2)
  • 4Seok Reyol Choi,Jin Seok Jang,Jong Hun Lee,Myung Hwan Roh,Min Chan Kim,Won Sup Lee,Waqar Qureshi.Role of Serum Tumor Markers in Monitoring for Recurrence of Gastric Cancer Following Radical Gastrectomy[J].Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2006(11)
  • 5N. Duraker,A. Naci ?elik,N. Gen?ler.The prognostic significance of gastric juice CA 19-9 and CEA levels in gastric carcinoma patients[J].European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2002(8)
  • 6Nüvi?tDuraker,Ali? Naci??eli?k.The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19‐9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA[J].J Surg Oncol.2001(4)
  • 7Sumiya Ishigami,Shoji Natsugoe,Shuuichi Hokita,Xiangming Che,Kohki Tokuda,Akihiro Nakajo,Hirohumi Iwashige,Masahiro Tokushige,Teruhiko Watanabe,Sonshin Takao,Takashi Aikou.Clinical Importance of Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Levels in Gastric Cancer[J].Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2001(1)
  • 8M. Ychou,J. Duffour,A. Kramar,S. Gourgou and,J. Grenier.Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer[J].Disease Markers.2000(3,4)
  • 9R. Lamerz.Role of Tumour Markers, Cytogenetics[J].Annals of Oncology.1999(4)
  • 10A. Webb,P. Scott-Mackie,D. Cunningham,A. Norman,J. Andreyev,M. O’Brien,J. Bensted.The prognostic value of serum and immunohistochemical tumour markers in advanced gastric cancer[J].European Journal of Cancer.1996(1)

共引文献147

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部