期刊文献+

基于有投机特征的前期损益与损失厌恶的报童决策分析

Newsvendor decision analysis based on speculative characteristics of prior gains and losses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对具有较强投机特征的前景报童批量决策场景,引入前期损益概念推广至考虑若干期的累积前期损益,并将其纳入影响时变特征下损失厌恶系数的因素,以此构建受累积前期损益影响的前景报童订货模型以分析累积前期损益对报童订货批量的影响。研究表明(1)若存在累积前期收益,可使得报童订货批量增大;反之,报童订货批量减少;(2)非对称效应同等程度的累积前期收益带来的订货批量的改变量较同等程度的累积前期损失更大;(3)均值偏向程度改变累积前期损益值增加,高利润情境下的订货偏差程度下降,低利润情境中的订货偏差程度上升。 In view of the newsvendor batch decision-making prospect with strong speculative characteristics,this paper introduces the concept of prior gains and losses to consider the cumulative prior gains and losses of several periods,and takes it into account the factors that affect the loss aversion coefficient with time-varying characteristics,so as to construct the newsvendor ordering model affected by the cumulative prior gains and losses to analyze the impact of the cumulative prior gains and losses on the newsvendor ordering batch.The results show that:(1)if there exist accumulated prior gains,the newsvendors’order quantity will increase,conversely,the order quantity will decrease;(2)Asymmetric effect:the change of order quantity caused by the same degree of accumulated prior gains is larger than that caused by the same degree of accumulated prior losses;(3)The change of mean deviation degree:when the cumulative gains and losses increase,the order deviation decreases in the high profit situation,and increases in the low profit situation.
作者 谢军 程亮辉 易东波 刘玲 XIE Jun;CHENG Lianghui;YI Dongbo;LIU Ling(School of Business Administration,Nanchang Institute of Technology,Nanchang 330099,China)
出处 《南昌工程学院学报》 CAS 2022年第3期112-118,共7页 Journal of Nanchang Institute of Technology
基金 江西省人文社科研究项目(GL18208) 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ171002)。
关键词 前期损益 损失厌恶系数 报童问题 均值偏向 prior gains and losses loss aversion coefficient newsvendor problem mean deviation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1彭飞,史本山,黄登仕.极大极小价值离差的资产选择模型研究[J].管理学报,2004,1(3):290-294. 被引量:3
  • 2Keasey K, Moon P.Gambling With the house money in capital expenditure decisions: an experimental analysis [J].Economic Letters,1996,50 104-110.
  • 3Perry S.Time-varying risk premiums in petroleum futures prices [J].Energy Economics, 2002,24:539–556.
  • 4Javid A Y.Time varying risk return relationship:evidence from listed pakistani firms [J]. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2008, 22(1): 16-39.
  • 5Thaler R H, Johnson E J.Gambling with the house money and trying to breakeven:the effect of prior outcomes on risky choice [J].Management science,1990,36: 643-660.
  • 6Tversky K.Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk [J].Econometrics, 1979, 47: 263-291.
  • 7Tversky A, Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice [J]. Science,1981, 211(1): 453-458.
  • 8Barberis H M,Santos T. Prospect theory and asset prices [J].Qarterly Journal of Economics,2001,116(1):1-53.
  • 9Gneezy U, Kapteyn A, Potters J.Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment [J].Journal of Finance, 2003, 58: 821-838.
  • 10Ackert L, Charupat N, Church B, Deaves R. An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting [J].Experimental Economics, 2006, 9 (1): 5-16.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部