期刊文献+

学校发展的伦理审视 被引量:3

On Ethical Examination of School Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学校改革通常都打着发展旗号,但发展本身并非天然合理,对发展问题需要从伦理角度加以审视。目前学校发展措施中存在着一系列伦理问题,原因在于发展主体不同,导致不同利益抉择;发展本身存在歧义,导致路径选择迷茫;发展目的产生异化,导致价值取向偏差。学校改革措施中存在“反发展”现象,主要表现为透支发展、虚假发展和粗放发展,它们严重地扭曲了学校的真正发展,要解决这一发展过程中的伦理问题,其一要考虑回到教育原点,准确把握学校发展的本质;其二要关注发展的真正目的,促进以人为中心的发展;其三要消解教学功利化,掌握合适的教育方法;其四要克服利益分割,促进协调发展;其五要推进教育公平,共享发展资源。 School reform is usually put forward under the name of development,but school development itself isn’t naturally reasonable,and development issues need to be examined from an ethical perspective.At present,there are a series of ethical problems in the development of schools,which are due to the different subjects of development,resulting in different interests;ambiguity in the development itself,leading to confusion in road choice;alienation in the purpose of development,leading to deviation in value orientation.There is a phenomenon of‘anti-development’in schooling,which is mainly manifested in overdraft development,false development and extensive development.They seriously hinder the real development of schools.To solve the ethical problems in the process of development,we should firstly consider returning to the origin of education and accurately grasp the essence of school development;Secondly,we should eliminate the utilitarianism of teaching and grasp the appropriate educational method.The third is to ensure the conditions of development and attach importance to the purpose of development;the fourth is to overcome the division of interests and promote coordinated development;the last is to promote educational equity and share development resources.
作者 陈建华 CHEN Jian-hua(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期3-14,共12页 Journal of Educational Studies
关键词 发展 学校发展 “反发展” 发展伦理 发展目的 development school development anti-development development ethics development purpose
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1张玉林.从数字看教育不公[J].中国改革,2004(12):22-24. 被引量:13
  • 2劳伦斯.现代教育的起源和发展[M].纪晓林译.北京:北京语言学院出版社,1992.
  • 3马克思.资本论:第二卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2004:21.
  • 4赵汀阳.论可能生活[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004..
  • 5卢梭.社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 6樊浩,田海平.教育伦理[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2001.
  • 7鲍曼齐格蒙特.立法者与阐释者:论现代性、后现代性与知识分子[M].洪涛,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2000:67.
  • 8MACINTYRE A. Theses on Feuerbach: A Road not Taken[M]. Kelvin Knight :University of Notre Dame Press,1998 :223.
  • 9钱理群.北大在培养“精致的利己主义者”[N].中国青年报,2012-05 -03(02).
  • 10弗洛姆艾里希.健全的社会[M].孙恺祥,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2011:126.

共引文献47

同被引文献53

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部