思想与思想之路——海德格尔论思想之整体阐释的可能性

Thought and the Path of Thought:Heidegger on the Possibility of a Holistic Interpretation of Thought

我们对海德格尔思想能否进行一种整体阐释?这种阐释是体系性阐释吗?一种适宜的整体阐释需满足什么条件?珀格勒与海德格尔在1960年的通信中曾就上述问题进行了交流。针对这些问题,海德格尔的回应是:无论多么深刻的思想洞见,若不是运作在一条在可疑可问性中保持生机的道路上,就会沦为单纯口号和程序执行的对象,而没有使人竭尽全力去沉思有待思的东西,因此也就背离了思想阐释的使命。只有把基础问题与一条生发性的道路结合起来,对思想整体做出一种适宜阐释才是可能的。这一答复和其中的关键提示,对于任何一种试图在整体上把握海德格尔思想的研究工作都具有重要意义。

Can we have a holistic interpretation of Heidegger’s thought,is it a systematic interpretation,and what are the conditions for a suitable holistic interpretation?These questions were discussed between Otto P?ggeler and Martin Heidegger in their correspondence in 1960.Heidegger’s response to these questions was that no matter how profound the insight of thought,if it does not operate on a path that remains alive in its dubious questionability,it will be reduced to mere slogans and procedures,without making one do one’s best to contemplate what is to be contemplated,and therefore deviating from the mission of the interpretation of thought.An appropriate interpretation of thought as a whole is only possible if the basic question is combined with a path of emergence.This answer and its key hints contained therein are of great importance for any kind of research that attempts to grasp Heidegger’s thought in its entirety.