期刊文献+

面向学生过程表现的协作问题解决能力评估研究 被引量:4

Research on Students’ Process Behavior Data-based Collaborative Problem Solving Ability Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 立德树人,促进学生全面发展是新时代教育评价改革的宗旨,践行全面发展评价观基于学生全学习过程数据,为此需要借助信息技术实现对过程行为数据的自动采集和分析,提高评估的效率和准确性。该研究以协作问题解决能力为评估对象,探索信息技术创新评估工具的实践路径。在“评估三角”理论的指导下,首先从协作问题解决能力“多维-交互”的本质出发构建三维能力评估框架;其次,依托PSAA平台设计和开发基于过程数据流的协作问题解决能力自动化评估系统,实现集触发行为、采集行为、编码行为、推断能力和报告结果于一体的评估流程,并设计了对过程行为数据特别是会话内容质性特征的自动编码模型;最后,以B市140名初中生为实验对象验证了该评估系统的有效性、有用性和易用性。未来还需不断融合新理论和新技术改进和创新测评方法和工具,助推面向学生过程表现的核心素养评估的落地。 It is the purpose of educational evaluation reform in the new era to foster talents through virtue and promote students’ all-round development, which relies on student’s entire learning process performance. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of evaluation, it is necessary to realize automatic collection and analysis of process behavior data with information technology. In this study, we explore the practical path of innovating the assessment of collaborative problem solving ability. Firstly,under the guidance of “Assessment Triangle” theory, a three-dimensional ability assessment framework is constructed from the nature of “multi-dimension and interactivity”;Secondly, based on the PSAA platform, we design and develop the automated assessment system of collaborative problem solving based on process stream data, which realizes the integration of triggering behavior, collecting behavior, coding behavior, inferring ability and reporting the results into one system. Specifically, this system achieves the automatic coding of the qualitative characteristics on discourse data;Finally, a quasi-experiment in city B with 140 junior high school students is conducted to verify the validity, usefulness and ease of use of this assessment system. In the future, it is necessary to continuously innovate assessment methods and tools by integrating new theories and technologies, and thus to boost the implementation of core competency assessment rapidly based on students’ process behavior data.
作者 吴斓 余胜泉 骈扬 刘阳 Wu Lan;Yu Shengquan;Pian Yang;Liu Yang(School of Teacher Education,Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology,Nanjing 210044,Jiangsu;Advanced Innovation Center for Future Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 102206)
出处 《中国电化教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第7期87-96,共10页 China Educational Technology
基金 北京市教育科学“十四五”规划优先关注课题“人工智能教育应用体系构建研究”(课题编号:3020-0058)资助。
关键词 协作问题解决能力评估 人人协作 过程数据流 computer-based collaborative problem solving ability assessment human-to-human approach process data streaming
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献58

  • 1张生,王雪,齐媛.人工智能赋能教育评价:“学评融合”新理念及核心要素[J].中国远程教育,2021(2):1-8. 被引量:70
  • 2我国儿童青少年非智力因素发展的研究[J].心理发展与教育,1995,11(4):1-6. 被引量:13
  • 3陈平,丁树良,林海菁,周婕.等级反应模型下计算机化自适应测验选题策略[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):461-467. 被引量:38
  • 4戴海琦,陈德枝,丁树良,邓太萍.多级评分题计算机自适应测验选题策略比较[J].心理学报,2006,38(5):778-783. 被引量:30
  • 5Adams, R..l., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients muhinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1 - 23.
  • 6Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1981). An item response curve model for matrix-sampling data : The California grade-three assessment. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 10, 65 -90.
  • 7Bock, R. D., Thissen, D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1997). IRT estimation of domain scores. Journal of educational measurement, 34 (3), 197-211.
  • 8Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Ho, Y.-H. ( 2009 ). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests : A statistical solution for the bandwidth fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69 ( 3 ) , 369 - 385.
  • 9Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press Urbana.
  • 10Kahraman, N. , & Kamata, A. (2004). Increasing the precision of subscaie scores hy using out-of-scale information. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(6), 407-426.

共引文献43

同被引文献86

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部