期刊文献+

急诊科患者30 d死亡风险预测模型的构建与验证 被引量:4

Development and validation of a predictive model for the risk of 30-day death in emergency department patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急诊科患者30 d死亡危险因素,采用列线图构建预测模型并进行验证。方法采用回顾性队列研究方法,收集2021年1月1日至6月30日常德市第一人民医院急诊科收治的1091例患者的临床资料,其中1月1日至3月31日的741例患者为建模组,4月1日至6月30日的350例患者为验证组。收集患者的一般资料、入急诊科首次生命体征和实验室检查结果,计算改良早期预警评分(MEWS),并记录30 d转归。采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析筛选出30 d死亡的危险因素;根据多因素分析结果构建30 d死亡的列线图模型,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评估所建模型的一致性,采用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验评价预测模型的拟合程度。结果最终1091例患者均纳入分析,其中建模组741例,男性356例、女性385例,年龄(51.42±17.33)岁,30 d病死率为28.88%;验证组350例,男性188例、女性162例,年龄(52.88±16.11)岁,30 d病死率为24.00%。单因素分析结果显示,年龄、入急诊科时主要诊断、意识、呼吸频率(RR)、收缩压(SBP)、心率(HR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO_(2))、MEWS评分、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、降钙素原(PCT)、体质量指数(BMI)可能是急诊科患者30 d死亡的危险因素;进一步纳入多因素分析结果显示,MEWS评分〔优势比(OR)=14.22,95%可信区间(95%CI)为1.46~138.12〕、ESR(OR=46.71,95%CI为20.48~106.53)、PCT(OR=4.97,95%CI为2.46~10.02)、BMI(24.0~27.9 kg/m^(2):OR=37.82,95%CI为14.69~97.36;≥28.0 kg/m^(2):OR=62.11,95%CI为25.77~149.72)是急诊科患者30 d死亡的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。根据多因素分析筛选出的变量构建列线图模型,建模组模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.974(95%CI为0.753~0.983),验证组模型的AUC为0.963(95%CI为0.740~0.975);Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示,列线图模型的预测结果与实际情况差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.216,P=1.270)。结论MEWS评分联合BMI、ESR、PCT建立的预测模型可以科学、有效地预测急诊科患者30 d转归。 Objective To explore the risk factors for 30-day death in emergency department patients,and then construct a prediction model and validate it using nomogram.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinical data of 1091 patients admitted to the emergency department of the First People's Hospital of Changde from January 1 to June 30,2021 was collected,including 741 patients from January 1 to March 31 in the development group and 350 patients from April 1 to June 30 in the validation group.General information,first vital signs admitted to the emergency department,and laboratory results were collected,the modified early warning score(MEWS)was calculated,and 30-day outcomes were recorded.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the risk factors of 30-day death.According to the results of multivariate analysis,the nomogram was used to construct a 30-day death prediction model.The receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve)was used to evaluate the consistency of the prediction model,the calibration of the prediction model was evaluated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test.Results A total of 1091 patients were enrolled.There were 741 patients in the development group,including 356 males and 385 females,aged(51.42±17.33)years old,and the 30-day mortality was 28.88%.There were 350 patients in the validation group,including 188 males and 162 females,aged(52.88±16.11)years old,and the 30-day mortality was 24.00%.The results of the univariate analysis showed that age,primary diagnosis on admission,consciousness,respiratory rate(RR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),heart rate(HR),pulse oxygen saturation(SpO_(2)),MEWS score,erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR),procalcitonin(PCT)and body mass index(BMI)might be the risk factors for 30-day death in patients in the emergency department.The results of the multivariate analysis showed that the MEWS score[odds ratio(OR)=14.22,95%confidence interval(95%CI)was 1.46-138.12],ESR(OR=46.71,95%CI was 20.48-106.53),PCT(OR=4.97,95%CI was 2.46-10.02),BMI(24.0-27.9 kg/m^(2):OR=37.82,95%CI was 14.69-97.36;≥28.0 kg/m^(2):OR=62.11,95%CI was 25.77-149.72)were independent risk factors for 30-day death in the emergency department(all P<0.05).Using the four variables with the results of multivariate analysis to construct a nomogram prediction model,the area under the ROC curve(AUC)was 0.974(95%CI was 0.753-0.983)for the development group,and the AUC was 0.963(95%CI was 0.740-0.975)for the validation group.The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no statistically significant difference between the predicted outcome of the nomogram prediction model and the actual occurrence(χ2=1.216,P=1.270).Conclusion The prediction model developed by the MEWS score combined with BMI,ESR and PCT can scientifically and effectively predict the 30-day outcome of emergency department patients.
作者 陈湘 雷光锋 张雪晴 朱首珍 童丽 Chen Xiang;Lei Guangfeng;Zhang Xueqing;Zhu Shouzhen;Tong Li(Department of Nursing,the First People's Hospital of Changde,Changde 415000,Hunan,China)
出处 《中华危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期421-425,共5页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 湖南省科技创新计划项目(2017SK51304)。
关键词 急诊科 30 d病死率 预测模型 列线图 Emergency department 30-day mortality Prognostic model Nomogram
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献121

  • 1李志芹.脑出血患者的急诊室救治与护理[J].实用器官移植电子杂志,2013,1(5):295-296. 被引量:9
  • 2孟新科,杨径,吴华雄,朱虹,郑晓英,魏刚,刘德红,苏顺庭.MEWS与APACHEⅡ评分在急诊潜在危重病患者病情评价和预后预测中的对比研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2005,9(8):1-4. 被引量:158
  • 3Morgan R, Williams F, Wright M. An early warning scoring sys- tem for detecting developing critical illness[ J ]. Clin Intens Care, 1997, 8: 100.
  • 4Royal College of Physicians of London. National early warning score (NEWS) : standardising the assessment of acute - illness severity in the NHS. Royal College of Physicians, 2012. https:// www. rcplondon, ac. uk/resources/national - early - warning - score - news.
  • 5Subbe CP, KrugerM, Rutherford P. Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions [ J ]. Quarterly J Med, 2001, 94 : 521 - 526.
  • 6Lain TS, Mak PSK, Siu WS, et al. Validation of a modified ear- ly warning score (MEWS) in emergency department observation ward patients[J]. Hong Kong J Emerg Med, 2006, 13 ( 1 ) : 24 - 30.
  • 7Smith G, Prytherch D, Schmidt P, et al. Review and perform- ance evaluation of aggregate weighted "track and trigger" systems [J]. Resuscitation, 2008, 77(2): 170-179.
  • 8Smith GB, Prythereh DR, Meredith P, et al. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of earlycardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit ad- mission, and death [ J ]. Resuscitation, 2013, 84 (4) : 465 - 470.
  • 9O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG. British Thoracic Socie- ty. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients[ J]. Thorax, 2008, 63(Suppl 6): vil -68.
  • 10Gao C,Peng F, Peng L.Post-transplant recurrent periearditis with perieardial tamponade is successfully treated with eolchieine: A ease report[J].Exp Ther Med,2014,8(3):801-804.

共引文献234

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部