康复干预对产后腹直肌分离患者的应用效果评价

Evaluation of application effect of rehabilitation intervention on patients with postpartum rectus abdominis diastasis

目的 探讨产后腹直肌分离患者接受康复干预的临床效果。方法 90例产后腹直肌分离患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为常规干预组和康复干预组,各45例。常规干预组给予常规低频电刺激治疗干预,康复干预组在常规干预组基础上给予康复干预。比较两组患者干预前后的腰背疼痛情况、脐上腹直肌分离距离、脐下腹直肌分离距离以及患者干预满意度评分。结果 干预后,康复干预组腰背疼痛占比4.44%低于常规干预组的24.44%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,康复干预组脐上腹直肌分离距离(1.90±0.51)cm、脐下腹直肌分离距离(1.51±0.42)cm均小于常规干预组的(2.81±0.67)、(2.36±0.57)cm,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。康复干预组患者干预针对性、干预专业性、服务态度、服务宗旨、干预质量评分均高于常规干预组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 产后腹直肌分离患者实施康复干预可有效改善患者腰背疼痛情况、脐上腹直肌分离距离、脐下腹直肌分离距离以及干预满意度,显著提升预后水平。

Objective To discuss the clinical effect of rehabilitation intervention on patients with postpartum rectus abdominis diastasis. Methods A total of 90 patients with postpartum rectus abdominis diastasis as study subjects were randomly divided into conventional intervention group and rehabilitation intervention group, with 45 cases in each group. The conventional intervention group received conventional low frequency electrical stimulation, and the rehabilitation intervention group received rehabilitation intervention based on the conventional intervention group. The low back pain, the distance of the supraumbilical rectus abdominis diastasis,the distance of the subumbilical rectus abdominis diastasis before and after the intervention, and the patient’s satisfaction score were compared between the two groups. Results After the intervention, the proportion of low back pain in the rehabilitation intervention group was 4.44%, which was lower than 24.44% in the conventional intervention group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). After intervention, the distance of the supraumbilical rectus abdominis diastasis(1.90±0.51) cm and distance of the subumbilical rectus abdominis diastasis(1.51±0.42) cm in the rehabilitation intervention group were less than(2.81±0.67) and(2.36±0.57) cm in the conventional intervention group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The scores of intervention pertinence, intervention professionalism, service attitude, service tenet, and intervention quality in the rehabilitation intervention group were higher than those in the conventional intervention group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Rehabilitation intervention for patients with postpartum rectus abdominis Diastasis can effectively improve the low back pain, distance of the supraumbilical rectus abdominis diastasis, distance of the subumbilical rectus abdominis diastasis, and intervention satisfaction,and significantly improve the prognosis.