期刊文献+

管理研究中的“中国元素”:从情境到理论——兼评李家涛《从中国元素到全球管理理论——中国管理研究回顾与展望》 被引量:4

The Chinese Elements in Management Research: From Contexts to Theories——A Commentary on “Reflections on Chinese Management Research” by JT Li
下载PDF
导出
摘要 战略管理领域著名学者李家涛教授是最早一批来自中国并在国际上取得杰出声誉的学者之一,在中国学者于国际顶尖刊物发表论文三十周年之际,他撰文分享了关于中国管理研究的思考。我们认真阅读了李家涛教授的文章,认为中国管理研究要想打破桎梏,必须向国际管理学界贡献真正有中国经验和东方智慧的知识与洞见,做好中国情境与中国元素的具象与结构化,开发和完善中国本土管理理论。我们还认为,李家涛教授在这篇文章中所抛出的诸多观点和命题,如果得到适当回应,将有助于提升中国学者在主流管理领域的话语权,促进管理与组织科学的进化。同时,本文对李家涛教授提出的“中国元素”研究框架和学术倡议进行了补充和延伸。 At a time that marks the 30th anniversary of publications in top-tier management journals by scholars originally from China’s mainland,Professor Jiatao Li,a distinguished scholar in strategic management,shared his thoughts on Chinese management research community.After carefully reading his work of reflections,this paper points out that Chinese management research must strive to contribute knowledge and insights that embody real Chinese experience and oriental wisdom to the international community,by specifying and structuring Chinese contexts as well as elements,and developing Chinese indigenous theories.This commentary proposes that,many arguments and propositions put forward by Li,if answered properly,will help to enhance the voice of Chinese scholars in the mainstream communities,and promote the development of management and organizational science.Furthermore,this paper also extends a research framework centering on Chinese elements and some academic initiatives proposed by Professor Li.
作者 魏江 陈光沛 Jiang Wei;Guangpei Chen(School of Management,Zhejiang University;Institute of China's Science,Technology and Education Policy,Zhejiang University)
出处 《管理学季刊》 2022年第1期35-46,180,共13页 Quarterly Journal of Management
关键词 中国情境 本土理论 制度 创新追赶 Chinese context indigenous theory institution catch-up in innovation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献120

  • 1杨勃,刘娟.来源国劣势:新兴经济体跨国企业国际化“出身劣势”——文献评述与整合框架构建[J].外国经济与管理,2020,0(1):113-125. 被引量:39
  • 2Herrigel, G., Wittke, V., and Voskamp, U. The Process of Chinese Manufacturing Upgrading: Transitioning from Unilateral to Recursive Mutual Learning Relations[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2013,3(1 ).
  • 3Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., and Jiang, Y. An Institution-based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008,39(5).
  • 4Euo, Y., Tung, R. L. International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises: A Springboard Perspective[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007,38(4).
  • 5MacCormack, A., C. Baldwin, and J. Rusnak. Exploring the Duality between Product and Organizational Architectures: A Test of the "Mirroring Hypothesis"[J]. Research Policy, 2012,41(8).
  • 6Colfer, L., Baldwin, C. The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions [R]. Harvard Business School, 2010.
  • 7Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., and Van de Ven, A. H. Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013,56(1).
  • 8Eisenhardt, K. M. Building Theories .from Case Study Research [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14 (4).
  • 9MaeDuffie, J. P., Modularity-as-Property, Modularization-as-Process, and 'Modularity'-as-Frame: Lessons from Product Architecture Initiatives in the Global Automotive Industry[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2013,3( 1 ).
  • 10Simon, H. A. The Architecture of Complexity [J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1962, 106(6).

共引文献434

同被引文献39

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部