国内外象征性游戏研究的对比分析——基于CiteSpace可视化知识图谱的应用

Comparative Analysis of Symbolic Game Research at Home and Abroad——Application of Visual Knowledge Map Based on CiteSpace

围绕“象征性游戏研究”,应用CiteSpace可视化知识图谱,以2011—2021年中国知网中文数据库中的1126篇论文和Web of Science英文数据库中的755篇论文为研究样本,对国内外象征性游戏研究进行了对比分析。通过作者合作网络分析,研究发现:国外期刊作者的网络联系比国内更加紧密,且国外作者发表有关象征性游戏主题文章的频次稍高于国内作者。同时,通过关键词网络分析,研究发现:国内研究集中在游戏指导策略和游戏意义研究等方面,国外研究较多地关注象征性游戏对自闭症儿童的干预实践应用。对比分析国内外象征性游戏研究,国内在研究方法上应增多实证和量化研究;在研究内容上需加强对处境不利儿童的象征性游戏研究,此外,幼儿园本土化象征性游戏研究应着重投入实践和应用。

Centering on "symbolic game research", this paper analyzes the symbolic game research at home and abroad by using Cite Space visual knowledge map, taking 1126 papers in CNKI Chinese database and 755 papers in Web of Science English database from 2011 to 2021 as research samples. Through the analysis of author collaboration network, it is found that the network connection of foreign journal authors is closer than that of domestic ones, and the frequency of foreign authors publishing articles on symbolic games is slightly higher than that of domestic authors. At the same time, through keyword network analysis, it is found that domestic research focuses on game guidance strategy and game meaning, while foreign research focuses more on the intervention practice of symbolic games for autistic children. Comparing the symbolic game research at home and abroad, it is found that empirical and quantitative research should be strengthened in domestic research;In terms of research content, it is necessary to strengthen the symbolic game research of disadvantaged children and the localized symbolic game research of kindergarten, which should be put into practice and application.