期刊文献+

显隐性危险源场景下驾驶员避险能力评价研究

Study on Evaluation of Driver Aggression Ability under Scenes of Obvious and Recessive Danger Sources
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究显隐性危险源场景下驾驶员避险能力的差异性,借鉴中国交通事故深度调查数据库中的事故场景,利用Prescan软件构建测试场景并招募驾驶员进行避险能力驾驶模拟实验.采集7种驾驶参数数据用于表征驾驶员的避险能力,利用主成分分析法对参数进行降维,并用Ward法系统聚类对降维后得到的主成分因子进行聚类,实现对显隐性危险源场景下驾驶员避险行为的特征提取和避险能力的评价建议. In order to study the differences of driver avoidance abilities under the scenarios of explicit and hidden hazards,the accident scenarios from China in-depth accident study are utilized,test scenarios are constructed with the software Prescan,and drivers are recruited to conduct driving simulation experiments of avoidance abilities.Then,seven kinds of driving parameter data are collected to characterize the driver risk aversion ability.PCA method is used to reduce the dimension of the parameters,and Ward method is used to cluster the principal component factors obtained after dimensionality reduction.The results show that the feature extraction of driver risk aversion behavior and evaluation suggestions on their risk aversion ability under the scenes of explicit and hidden dangers are achieved.
作者 仲璜 王鹏 李晓虎 林淼 朱彤 ZHONG Huang;WANG Peng;LI Xiaohu;LIN Miao;ZHU Tong(College of Transportation Engineering,Chang'an University,Xi'an 710064,China;China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co.,Ltd,Tianjin 300300,China)
出处 《大连交通大学学报》 CAS 2022年第3期1-6,共6页 Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University
基金 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2019YFE0108000)。
关键词 交通安全 驾驶行为 主成分分析 系统聚类 模拟驾驶 traffic safety driving behavior principal component analysis system clustering driving simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1严新平,张晖,吴超仲,毛喆,雷虎.道路交通驾驶行为研究进展及其展望[J].交通信息与安全,2013,31(1):45-51. 被引量:41
  • 2彦章,尹志勇,王正国,朱佩芳.人格与危险驾驶行为及事故关系的研究与进展[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(36):8366-8367. 被引量:2
  • 3刘江,田萍,荣建,任福田.驾驶员气质与行车速度关系的初步研究[J].北京工业大学学报,2006,32(1):27-32. 被引量:19
  • 4S Banbury, S Tremblay . A Cognitive Approach to Situ- ation Awareness : Theory and Application [ M ]. UK : Aldershot Press ,2004 : 155 - 175.
  • 5Hull M, Christie RJ. The Hazard Perception Test:The Geelong Trial & Future Development [ M ]. Wellington: The Official Committee on Road Safety and Road Traf- fic Safety Research Council, 1993.
  • 6McKenna FP, Crick JL. Hazard Perception in Drivers: A Methodology for Testing and Training [ R ]. Crowthorne : Transport Research Laboratory, 1994.
  • 7Pelz D C, Krupat E. Caution Profile and Driving Re- cord of Undergraduate Males [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1974,6 ( 1 ) :45 - 58.
  • 8Wallis TSA, Horswill MS. Using Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory to Determine Why Experienced and Trained Drivers Respond Faster Than Novices in A Hazard Perception Test [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2007,39(6) :1177 - 1185.
  • 9Sagberg F Bj, Mskau T. Hazard Perception and Driving Experience among Novice Drivers [ J ]. Accident Analy- sis & Prevention,2006,38 ( 2 ) :407 - 414.
  • 10Benda H, Hoyos CG. Estimating Hazards in Traffic Sit- uations [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1983,15 (1):1 -9.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部