期刊文献+

单通道负压吸引鞘在经皮肾镜中的临床应用

Application of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with negative pressure suction in one channel
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨单通道负压吸引鞘在经皮肾镜治疗肾结石的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析北京平谷区医院和哈尔滨工业大学附属黑龙江省医院从2018年1月至2019年11月住院期间的111例肾结石患者,一组行负压吸引鞘(Y型鞘)经皮肾镜手术56例(负压组),一组行常规鞘(常压鞘)经皮肾镜手术55例(常压组)。分别记录两组的手术时间、肾盂压力、术中患者出血量、术后结石清除率、术中术后并发症等临床资料,对两组患者的临床资料进行分析和总结。结果观察组的手术时间、肾盂压力明显低于对照组并且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组结石清除率,术中出血量,术后出血发生率两组比较,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后发热发生率,术后总并发症发生率、术后第1天降钙素原(PCT)值、C反应蛋白(CRP)值明显低于对照组且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论单通道负压吸引鞘在经皮肾镜中应用安全性高,并发症少。 Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of negative pressure suction in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods The data of all patients were diagnosed with renal stones between January,2018 and November,2019 were analyzed retrospectively.All patients were divided into two groups.The experimental group included 56 patients and the control group included 55 patients.The experimental group was operated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy with negative pressure suction and the control was done by routine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Operative time,stone-free rate,renal pelvis pressure,complications were compared between the two groups.Results The renal pelvis pressure and operate time in the experimental group are less than those in the control group(P<0.05).There are no difference between two groups in the stone-free rate,blood loss volume the rate of blood loss(P>0.05).The rate of fever and total complications,the level of PCT and CRP in the experimental is less than the control group.Conclusions It is safe and effective that the negative pressure is used in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
作者 李海立 牛吉瑞 Li Haili;Niu Jirui(Department of Urology,Beijing Pinggu Hospital,Beijing 101200,China;Department of Urology,Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital,Harbin Institute of Technology,Heilongjiang 150000,China)
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2022年第3期228-230,共3页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
关键词 肾结石 负压吸引鞘 经皮肾镜 Renal stone Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Negative pressure suction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献51

  • 1于永刚,廖松柏,武英杰,李学德,曾志玮,李少静.肾盂恒压灌注对肾损伤的实验研究[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(5):387-389. 被引量:53
  • 2卢燕雯.输血科核查制度与检验新规范及主任工作必备手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,10:224-236.
  • 3Lam JS, Greene TD,Gupta M. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi : holmium: YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[ J]. J Urol, 2002,167(5 ) : 1972-1796.
  • 4Zhong P, Tong HL, Cocks FH, et al. Transient cavitation and acoustic emission produced by different laser lithotripters [ J ]. J Endourol, 1998,12(6) ; 371-378.
  • 5Hosseini MM, Basiri A, Mog haddam SM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of patients with staghon stone and incidental puulent fluid suggestive of infection[ J]. J Endourol, 2007,21 (12) : 1429-1432.
  • 6Draga RO, Kok ET, Sorel MR, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: factors associated with fever after the first postoperative day and systemic inflammatory response syndrome [ J ]. Endourol, 2009, 23(6) : 921-927.
  • 7Naveen Eipe,Manickam Ponniah.Perioperative Blood Loss Assessment-How Accurate[J].Indian J ANaesth,2006,50:35-38.
  • 8钱彪,王勤章,丁国富,刘建军,汪晓东,齐亚军,李维仁.新疆南部维吾尔族尿石症患者病例对照研究[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2008,13(5):344-346. 被引量:27
  • 9钟文,曾国华,杨后猛,桂志明,李逊,吴开俊.微创经皮肾镜取石术中肾盂内压变化对术后发热的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(10):668-671. 被引量:99
  • 10杜传策,宋乐明,秦文,钟久庆,郭树林,彭作锋,刘泰荣,胡敏,朱伦锋,姚磊,杨忠圣,黄建荣.有、无负压装置微创经皮肾镜取石肾盂内压变化对比研究[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,4(1):27-29. 被引量:12

共引文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部