国内外枸杞农药残留限量标准对比分析

Comparative analysis of domestic and foreign pesticide residue limit standards for Lycium barbarum L.

目的对比不同国家、地区枸杞中农药的最大残留限量(maximum residues limits,MRLs)标准,对其差异进行分析。方法查阅整理我国、欧盟(European Union,EU)、国际食品法典委员会(Codex Alimentarius Commission,CAC)、韩国和日本关于枸杞农药MRLs的标准,分析我国、EU、CAC、韩国和日本在枸杞农药MRLs标准体系上的差异。结果我国规定了枸杞中116种农药MRLs标准,而EU、CAC、韩国、日本分别规定了498、15、52、214种,我国标准与EU、CAC、韩国和日本的标准共同关注度分别是13.9%、11.0%、5.7%和17.4%。结论我国与EU、CAC、韩国及日本的枸杞农药MRLs标准中种类及数量均存在差异,但我国标准符合我国实际国情。但为了避免枸杞出口受阻,在修订我国枸杞农药MRLs标准时,可以参考与我国有枸杞贸易往来的其他国家、地区及组织的标准。

Objective To compare the maximum residue limits(MRLs)standards of pesticides in Lycium barbarum L.from different countries and regions,and analyze the differences.Methods The standards of MRLs of pesticides in Lycium barbarum L.of China,European Union(EU),Codex Alimentarius Commission(CAC),Korea and Japan were reviewed,the differences between China,EU,CAC,Korea and Japan on the standard system of MRLs of pesticides in Lycium barbarum L.were analyzed.Results China had stipulated 116 kinds of pesticide MRLs standards in Lycium barbarum L.,while the EU,CAC,Korea and Japan had stipulated 498,15,52 and 214 kinds of pesticide MRLs standards,respectively,and the common concerns of our standards with the EU,CAC,Korea and Japan were 13.9%,11.0%,5.7%and 17.4%,respectively.Conclusion MRLs standards for Lycium barbarum L.pesticides in the types and quantities are different between China and EU,CAC,South Korea and Japan,but our standards are consistent with the actual situation in China.In order to avoid the export of Lycium barbarum L.obstruction,in the revision of China’s pesticide MRLs standards for Lycium barbarum L.,it is suggested to refer to the standards of other countries,regions and organizations that have trade with Lycium barbarum L.