期刊文献+

美国精英高校整体性录取的目标与策略——基于七所高校的考察 被引量:1

Goals and Strategies of Holistic Admissions At American Elite Colleges and Universities:Based on the Investigation of Seven Institutions
原文传递
导出
摘要 进入21世纪后,美国精英高校普遍采用具有鲜明多元特征的整体性录取机制选拔本科生源。为追求卓越、公平与多样化三大共性目标,美国精英高校通过综合评价和整体性审阅路径两种策略来开展整体性录取。基于多重标准的综合评价,指向判断申请者个人的成功潜能、贡献潜能、获益潜能,以及对不同申请者群体的差异标准。融合多样手段的整体性审阅路径,包括背景考察、个体考察、集体评议。美国经验对我国“双一流”建设高校探索建立具有中国特色的多元录取机制有启思价值。 After entering the 21st century,American elite colleges and universities generally adopt the holistic admissions mechanism with prominent diversified characteristics to select undergraduate students.In order to pursue the three common goals of excellence,fairness and diversity,American elite colleges and universities carry out holistic admissions through comprehensive evaluation and holistic review approach.The comprehensive evaluation based on multiple criteria points to the criteria for judging the individual applicant’s potential of being succeed in college,making external contribution and benefiting from college education,as well as the different criteria for different groups of applicants.A holistic review path integrating various means,includes contextual review,individualized review and collective review.The American experience has enlightening value for China’s“double first-class”constructing universities to explore and establish a diversified admissions mechanism with Chinese characteristics.
作者 郑若玲 万圆 Zheng Ruoling;Wan Yuan(Collaborative Innovation Center of Higher Education Quality Construction,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005;Higher Education and Education Legality Institute,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620)
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第7期56-65,共10页 Research in Educational Development
基金 2018年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“高考综合改革试点完善措施研究”(18JZDO52)的部分成果。
关键词 整体性录取 招生目标 综合评价 整体性审阅 美国精英高校 holistic admissions admission goals comprehensive evaluation holistic review elite colleges and universities in the U.S
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1陈瑞华.应当如何设计刑事审判程序[J].中外法学,1996,8(3):41-43. 被引量:5
  • 2周湖勇.大学治理中的程序正义[J].高等教育研究,2015,36(1):1-11. 被引量:42
  • 3郑若玲.《美国大学招考制度的启示》,《光明日报》2007年5月9日,第11版.
  • 4亚瑟·科恩.《美国高等教育通史》,北京.北京大学出版社,2010年版,第145-147页.
  • 5Soares,J.A.The Power of Privilege:Yale and America’s Elite Colleges.Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press,2007,25.
  • 6Soares,J.A.“For Tests That Are Predictively Powerful and without Social Prejudice.”Research&Practice in Assessment,7(2012).
  • 7普林斯顿大学申请材料中的中学报告表格.
  • 8Needham,Jerry.“North East Class Ranks Draw Anger.”San Antonio Express-News,November 14,2006.
  • 9End the 50%Admissions Rule?DesMoines Register,November 27,2006.http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=OPINION.
  • 10Atkinson,R.,and S.Geiser.“Reflections on a Century of College Admissions Tests.”Research&Occasional Paper Series:CSHE.4.09,Berkeley:University of California,http://cshe.berkeley.edu/,2009.

共引文献37

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部