期刊文献+

产品显性防伪技术(OACT)投资的供应链决策机制研究

Research into Investment Decision Mechanical of Supply Chain Anti-Counterfeiting System Base on Reliability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以OACT防伪体系为研究对象,研究了供应链中品牌厂商及零售商的防伪投资决策机制。建立了产品品牌商与零售商的防伪技术投资决策非合作、决策合作及供应链整合三种决策机制下的博弈模型,得到了三种机制下的均衡防伪可信度、均衡防伪投资阈值以及均衡利润,并进行了比较分析。最后,建立了产品显性防伪技术的供应链防伪投资HSN契约协调机制。研究发现均衡防伪可信度始终随市场假货渗透率的增加而增加,随防伪投资成本系数增加而减少。同时均衡防伪可信度在投资非合作决策机制下最低,在投资合作决策机制下次之,供应链整合情形下最高;均衡防伪投资阈值在非合作决策机制下最低,投资合作情形下次之,供应链整合情形下最高。 Taking OACT anti-counterfeiting system as a research object,the anti-counterfeiting investment decision-making mechanism of brand manufacturers and retailers in the supply chain has been studied.Three anti-counterfeiting technology investment decision-making game model,including non-cooperation,cooperation and supply chain integration are established.The equilibrium of anti-counterfeiting credibility,anti-counterfeiting investment threshold and profit are obtained and compared.In the end,The HSN contract coordination mechanism of supply chain anti-counterfeiting investment is established.The result shows that the reliability of anti-counterfeiting increases with the market penetration rate of counterfeit product and decreases with the cost coefficient of investment.Meanwhile,the reliability of anti-counterfeiting is the lowest under the condition of noncooperation,lower under the condition of cooperation and the highest under the condition of supply chain integration,whereas the anti-counterfeiting investment threshold is the highest under the condition of noncooperation,higher under the condition of cooperation and the lowest under the condition of supply chain integration.
作者 张子健 何清 ZHANG Zi-jian;HE Qing(School of Economics and Management,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期67-73,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BGL177)。
关键词 显性防伪技术 防伪可信度 供应链决策 overt anti-counterfeiting technologies reliability of anti-counterfeit supply chain decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘涛.假冒伪劣治理的经济博弈分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2004(8):51-54. 被引量:5
  • 2宋娟.论伪劣商品的成因及其治理——基于信息不对称条件下的博弈分析[J].特区经济,2005(3):228-229. 被引量:4
  • 3翁媛媛.产品质量问题的动态博弈分析[J].商场现代化,2007(05Z):62-63. 被引量:3
  • 4Berman B. Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity[J]. Business Horizons, 2008, 51 (3) : 191-199.
  • 5Staake T, Thiesse F, Fleisch E. The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review[ J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2009, 43(3/4): 320-349.
  • 6Minagawa T, Trott P, Hoecht A. Counterfeit, imitation, reverse engineering and learning: reflections from Chinese manufac- turing firms[J]. R & D Management, 2007, 37(5) : 455-467.
  • 7Shultz II C, Nill A. The societal conundrum of intellectual property rights : a game-theoretical approach to the equitable man- agement and protection of IPR[J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2002, 36(5/6) : 667-688.
  • 8Wilcock A E, Boys K A. Reduce product counterfeiting: an integrated approach [ J ]. Business Horizons, 2014, 57 (2) : 279-288.
  • 9Engelbrecht G N. On therelevance of game theory in strategic thinking[ J ]. Scientia Militaria South African Journal of Military Studies, 1999(29) : 36-52.
  • 10谢识予.假冒伪劣现象的经济学分析[J].经济研究,1997,32(8):71-78. 被引量:64

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部