期刊文献+

角色压力对校长职业倦怠的影响:正念的中介作用 被引量:4

Examining role stress and job burnout among principals:Mediating role of mindfulness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨角色压力对校长职业倦怠水平的影响,以及正念的中介作用。方法:采用正念量表(MAAS)、李超平和张翼所编制的角色压力问卷和职业倦怠量表对393名中小学校长进行问卷调查。结果:正念与角色压力存在负相关(r=-0.457,P<0.01);正念与职业倦怠存在正相关(r=-0.355,P<0.01);角色压力与职业倦怠存在正相关(r=0.410,P<0.01)。正念在中小学校长的角色压力和职业倦怠之间起部分中介作用,中介效应比例为37%,Bootstrap输出的95%的置信区间为(0.15,0.24)。结论:角色压力不仅能直接影响校长的职业倦怠水平,还能通过中介变量正念影响校长的职业倦怠。 Objective:To explore the effect of role stress on school principals’ job burnout and the mediating role of mindfulness.Methods:A total of 393 primary and secondary school principals were surveyed by using the Role Stress Questionnaire(MAAS),Li Chaoping and Zhang Yi(2009)and the Job Burnout Questionnaire(Maslach 1986).Results:There was a negative correlation between mindfulness and role stress(r=-0.457,P<0.01).There was a positive correlation between mindfulness and burnout(r=-0.355,P<0.01).Role stress was positively correlated with job burnout(r=0.410,P<0.01).Mindfulness played a partial mediating role between role stress and job burnout of primary and secondary school principals, and the mediating effect proportion was 37%.The 95% confidence interval of Bootstrap output was(0.15,0.24).Conclusion:Role stress can not only directly affect the level of principals’ job burnout, but also influence principals’ job burnout through mindfulness.
作者 笱崇敏 李劲松 杨舒涵 GOU Chongmin;LI Jinsong;YANG Shuhan(Faculy of Education,Yunman Normal University,Kunming 650500,China)
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 北大核心 2022年第4期562-567,共6页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(编号:17CMZ039)。
关键词 小学校长 职业倦怠 正念 角色压力 Principals Job burnout Mindfulness Role stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献71

  • 1王茜.心理咨询师职业枯竭成因探析[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2011(S1):113-114. 被引量:3
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7815
  • 3蒋奖,许燕,张姝玥,陈浪.心理咨询师工作倦怠调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(12):854-855. 被引量:30
  • 4[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 5[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 6[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 7[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 8[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 9[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 10[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312

共引文献8166

同被引文献57

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部