摘要
目的:了解中医药健康服务政策工具的应然值和实然值的情况,为中医药健康服务的政策制定提供参考。方法:运用层次分析法进行专家咨询,比较和分析不同类型政策工具的应然值和实然值;借鉴二维象限法按应然值和实然值的高低组合呈应然高实然高、应然低实然高、应然高实然低、应然低实然低四类分布四分类。结果:专家一致认为三类政策工具的应然值和实然值均呈现出环境型、供给型、需求型价值依次递减的趋势;供给型政策工具实然值高于应然值(P<0.05)。结论:保持环境型政策工具的优势地位、加大供给型政策工具的投入力度、转变需求型政策工具的应用方式。
Objective To understand the theoretical and practical value of health service policy tools of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM),and provide reference for policy-making of TCM health service.Methods The AHP method was used for expert consultation to compare and analyze the expected value and actual value of different types of policy instruments.Referring to the two-dimensional quadrant method,it can be divided into four categories according to the combination of theoretical and practical value.Results Experts agreed that the theoretical and practical values of the three types of policy instruments showed a decreasing trend in the order of environment,supply and demand.The actual value of supply-oriented policy instruments was higher than that of theoretical value(P<0.05).Conclusion It is suggested to maintain the dominant position of environmental policy tools,increase the investment of supply-oriented policy tools,and change the application mode of demand-oriented policy tools.
作者
吴剑
刘霞
王军永
Wu Jian(Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanchang,P.R.China)
出处
《中国卫生事业管理》
北大核心
2022年第6期406-411,共6页
Chinese Health Service Management
基金
国家自然基金“供需均衡诉求下农村老年人家庭照护承载力的测度与优化研究”(72064022)
江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“中医药健康服务统计调查制度研究——以江西省为例”(JD19067)
江西中医药大学1050人才工程支持项目(202013109)△。
关键词
中医药健康服务
政策工具
层次分析法
TCM health services
policy tools
analytic hierarchy process
