期刊文献+

Molecular evolution and deorphanization of bitter taste receptors in a vampire bat

原文传递
导出
摘要 Bats represent the largest dietary radiation in a single mammalian order,and have become an emerging model group for studying dietary evolution.Taste receptor genes have proven to be molecular signatures of dietary diversification in bats.For example,all 3 extant species of vampire bats have lost many bitter taste receptor genes(Tas2rs)in association with their dietary shift from insectivory to sanguivory.Indeed,only 8 full-length Tas2rs were identified from the high-quality genome of the common vampire bat(Desmodus rotundus).However,it is presently unknown whether these bitter receptors are functional,since the sense of taste is less important in vampire bats,which have an extremely narrow diet and rely on other senses for acquiring food.Here,we applied a molecular evolutionary analysis of Tas2rs in the common vampire bat compared with non-vampire bats.Furthermore,we provided the first attempt to deorphanize all bitter receptors of the vampire bat using a cell-based assay.We found that all Tas2r genes in the vampire bat have a level of selective pressure similar to that in non-vampire bats,suggesting that this species must have retained some bitter taste functions.We demonstrated that 5 of the 8 bitter receptors in the vampire bat can be activated by some bitter compounds,and observed that the vampire bat generally can not detect naturally occurring bitter compounds examined in this study.Our study demonstrates functional retention of bitter taste in vampire bats as suggested by cell-based functional assays,calling for an in-depth study of extra-oral functions of bitter taste receptors.
出处 《Integrative Zoology》 SCIE CSCD 2021年第5期659-669,共11页 整合动物学(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31722051) Natural Science Foundation of the Hubei Province(2019CFA075).
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Abaffy T, Matsunami H, Luetje C W. 2006. Functional analysis of a mammalian odorant receptor subfamily. Journal of Neurochemistry, 97 (5): 1506-1518.
  • 2Buck L, Axel R. 1991. A novel muhigene family may encode odorant receptors : a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell, 65 ( 1 ) : 175 - 187.
  • 3Dulac C, Axel R. 1995. A novel family of genes encoding putative pheromone receptors in mammals. Cell, 83 (2) : 195 -206.
  • 4Firestein S. 2001. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Na- ture, 413 (6852): 211-218.
  • 5Glusman G, Bahar A, Sharon D, Pilpel Y, White J, Lancet D. 2000. The olfactory receptor gene superfamily : data mining, classification, and nomenclature. Mammalian Genome Offwial Journal of the Inter- national Mammalian Genome Society, 11 ( 11 ) : 1016 - 1023.
  • 6Hayden S, Bekaert M, Crider T A, Mariani S, Murphy W J, Teeling E C. 2010. Ecological adaptation determines functional mammalian olfactory subgenomes. Genome Research, 20 ( 1 ) : 1 - 9.
  • 7Hayden S, Bekaert M, Goodbla A, Murphy W J, Davalos L M, Teeling E C. 2014. A cluster of olfactory receptor genes linked to frugivory in bats. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31 (4) : 917 -927.
  • 8Jones K E, Maclarnon A M. 2004. Affording larger brains: testing hy- potheses of mammalian brain evolution on bats. American Natural- /st, 164 (1): E20-31.
  • 9Jones G, Teeling E C, Rossiter S J. 2013. From the ultrasonic to theinfrared : molecular evolution and the sensory biology of bats. Fron- tiers in Physiology, 4: 117.
  • 10Jones G, Holderied M W. 2007. Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 274 (1612): 905-912.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部