期刊文献+

口述史的叙事分析——以蒙古族老人松布尔的口述史为例

Narrative Analysis of Oral History:The Oral History of Mongolian Songbur as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 蒙古族老人松布尔的口述史叙事模式中,第一人称和第三人称叙述交替出现,且第一人称叙述摆脱了限知视角,与第三人称的全知视角相融合,而第三人称叙述有讲述者在场和不在场的两种叙述以及隐藏行为主体的叙述模式。这样的叙事特征是在自然的社会沟通交流中,基于历史真实性,通过感性回忆和语言回忆实践而形成的。讲述者在场的第三人称叙述是维持口述史真实性的叙事模式,而讲述者不在场的第三人称叙述是向民间故事叙事发展的表现,是叙事化最客观的表现,更适合超越家庭的更大社会群体环境的叙事模式。这呈现了口述史与民间故事有故事共性,而在叙事模式上各自追求历史真实性和艺术想象力的特征。 Songbur’s oral history narrative mode shows that the first person and the third person narration alternate,and the first person narration gets rid of the limited perspective and integrates with the omniscient perspective of the third person,while the third person narration has two narrative modes:the presence and absence of the narrator and the hidden action as the main body.Such a narrative feature is formed in the natural social communication,based on“historical authenticity”and through the practice of perceptual memory and language memory.The third person narration in the presence of the narrator is a narrative mode to maintain the authenticity of oral history,while the third person narration in the absence of the narrator is a manifestation of the development of folk story narration.It is the most objective expression of narration,and is more suitable for the narrative mode of a larger social group environment beyond the family.This feature shows that oral history and folk stories have“story”in common,but each pursues“historical authenticity”and artistic“imagination”in narrative mode.
作者 斯琴 SI Qin(School of Ethnology,North Minzu University,Yinchuan 750021,China)
出处 《北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期107-116,共10页 Journal of North Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 北方民族大学引进人员科研启动项目“蒙古口述史研究”(2020KYQD24)。
关键词 口承传统 口述史 历史叙述 叙事模式 记忆构建 Oral Tradition Oral History Historical Narration Narrative Mode Memory Construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1石泰安 耿昇译.《川甘青藏走廊古部落》[M].四川民族出版社,1992年版..
  • 2.《华夏边缘—历史记忆与族群认同》[M].台北:允晨文化实业股份公司,1997年..
  • 3王明珂.《根基历史:羌族的弟兄故事》[A].黄应贵主编.《时间、历史与记忆》[C].中研院民族研究所(台北),1999年版..
  • 4Lewis A. Coser, "Introduction: Maurice Halbwachs," in On Collective Memory, ed. & trans, by Lewis A. Coser(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992).
  • 5Maurice Halbwachs, Les cadres sociaux de la memoire (Paris:Presses Universitaires de France, 1952).
  • 6Frederick Bartlett, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (London: Cambridge University Press, 1932), pp. 199-202, 296.
  • 7James Fentress and Chris Wickham, Social Memory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992), p. Ⅸ .
  • 8Robert J. Sharer & Wendy Ashmore, Archaeology: Discovering Our Past (Mountain View, CA. : Mayfield Publishing Co., 1987), pp. 72-75.
  • 9王明珂.《历史文献的社会记忆残余本质与异例研究—考古学的隐喻》,《民国以来的史料与史学》,国史馆(台北),1998年.
  • 10Henry S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas(USA: Dorset Press, 1986/1861).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部